New ways to kill your mother Writers and their families

Colm Tóibín, 1955-

Book - 2012

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

809/Toibin
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 809/Toibin Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Scribner 2012.
Language
English
Main Author
Colm Tóibín, 1955- (-)
Edition
1st Scribner hardcover ed
Physical Description
345 p.
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9781451668551
9781451668568
  • Jane Austen, Henry James and the Death of the Mother
  • Part 1. Ireland
  • W. B. Yeats: New Ways to Kill Your Father
  • Willie and George
  • New Ways to Kill Your Mother: Synge and His Family
  • Beckett Meets His Afflicted Mother
  • Brian Moore: Out of Ireland Have I Come, Great Hatred, Little Room
  • Sebastian Barry's Fatherland
  • Roddy Doyle and Hugo Hamilton: The Dialect of the Tribe
  • Part 2. Elsewhere
  • Thomas Mann: New Ways to Spoil Your Children
  • Borges: A Father in His Shadow
  • Hart Crane: Escape from Home
  • Tennessee Williams and the Ghost of Rose
  • John Cheever: New Ways to Make Your Family's Life a Misery
  • Baldwin and "the American Confusion"
  • Baldwin and Obama: Men Without Fathers
  • Bibliography
  • Acknowledgements
  • Index
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Through a series of accessible essays, lectures, and reviews that rove from Jane Austen to Brian Moore-many of which appeared in either the London or New York Review of Books- Toibin explores the ambivalent relationships that many writers of the past few centuries have had with their families. The topics Toibin (All a Novelist Needs: Essays on Henry James) addresses include the troubled bond between W.B. Yeats and his father, the fate of Thomas Mann's children, and John Cheever's alcoholic parenting and sexual hijinks. The book is divided into two sections: "Ireland," containing chapters about Irish poets, playwrights, and novelists, such as John Synge and Sebastian Barry; and "Elsewhere," which roves from Jorge Luis Borges to Tennessee Williams. With essays that prove more informative than argumentative, along with useful minibiographies of important authors, Toibin excels when discussing craft, such as in the opening essay, which compares structural devices in the novels of Jane Austen and Henry James that for some reason necessitate an absent mother. Though chock-full of biographic detail that will interest ardent readers, Toibin unfortunately resists drawing conclusions from the various case studies. But overall, given their figurative patricidal, matricidal, fratricidal, and infanticidal tendencies, one ought to be thankful not to have a writer in the family. Agent: Peter Straus, Rogers, Coleridge, and White. (June) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

Toibin (The Master) is perhaps better known for his novels and short stories, but he also writes nonfiction and contributes to literary reviews. The pieces in this collection, which includes three essays originally given as lectures, were all previously published. They examine familial influence on writers in relation to their general output more than in relation to particular works, though Toibin often intersperses quotations from the writers' works and letters. The pieces are grouped here by nationality of the writers examined, starting with those who, like him, are Irish-the title comes from his essay about J.M. Synge. These are scholarly and learned essays, to be read slowly and digested; the pieces that began as lectures are dense and not that easy to follow. All the pieces presuppose knowledge of the writers and their works. That being said, there is a lot of intriguing family history surrounding the authors discussed of which this reviewer was unaware. A couple of the essays, however, e.g., those on Yeats and Beckett, do not seem fully to support the author's theses. VERDICT For the serious student of literature, this collection is worth the effort. [See Prepub Alert, 1/21/12.]-Gina Kaiser, Univ. of the Sciences Lib., Philadelphia (c) Copyright 2012. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Irish novelist and essayist Tibn (Brooklyn, 2009, etc.) investigates how writers' classic works were inspired by their families--and sometimes in spite of them. One line of critical thinking holds that a writer's personal history is out of bounds when judging a poem, play or novel. Tibn, who mined the life of Henry James for his 2004 novel, The Master, doesn't adhere to that notion, and these essays are largely concerned with how writers' personal lives influenced their work. In the opening essay, the author explores why James and Jane Austen tended to avoid writing about mothers, who "get in the way in fiction," and how that instinct was partly a product of their occasionally tense family relationships. Half the pieces that follow focus on Irish writers, including William Butler Yeats, Samuel Beckett and Roddy Doyle; the other half consider the non-Irish likes of Thomas Mann, Tennessee Williams, James Baldwin and others. Most of these pieces, written for the London Review of Books or the New York Review of Books, are piecework prompted by a new biography or collection of letters, but common themes emerge. Dominating mothers provoked Irish playwright J.M. Synge and Beckett (who declared in a letter, "I am what her savage loving has made me"), and closeted homosexuality frustrated Williams and Cheever's lives and writing alike. Tragedies abound: Yeats brutally dismissed his father's literary ambitions, Thomas Mann's children were a riot of addiction and dysfunction, and Hart Crane's pioneering career as a poet ended in suicide. But like all fine critics, Tibn inspires readers to go back to the work, and he brings a human aspect to the works of seemingly deracinated authors like Beckett and Jorge Luis Borges. Though there's no truly coherent thesis here, it's a pleasure to watch Tibn rove through 19th- and 20th-century literary history.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

New Ways to Kill Your Mother: Writers and Their Families By Colm Tóibín Scribner ISBN: 9781451668551 Jane Austen, Henry James and the Death of the Mother In November 1894 Henry James set down in his notebooks a sketch for the novel that became The Wings of the Dove , which was published eight years later. He wrote about a possible heroine who was dying but in love with life. "She is equally pathetic in her doom and in her horror of it. If she only could live just a little; just a little more - just a little longer." In his outline James also had in his mind a young man who "wishes he could make her taste of happiness, give her something that it breaks her heart to go without having known. That "something" can only be - of course - the chance to love and be loved." James also noted as a possibility the position of another woman to whom the man was "otherwise attached and committed . . . It appears inevitably, or necessarily, preliminary that his encounter with the tragic girl shall be through the other woman." He also saw the reason why the young man and the woman to whom he was committed could not marry. "They are obliged to wait . . . He has no income and she no fortune, or there is some insurmountable opposition on the part of her father. Her father, her family, have reasons for disliking the young man." This idea, then, of the dying young woman and the penniless young man on one side and, on the other, of father, family and young woman with no fortune circled in James's fertile mind. There was no moment, it seemed, in which the second young woman would have a mother; it was "her father, her family" that would oppose the marriage; over the next five or six years James would work out the form this opposition would take, and who exactly "her family" would be. In her book Novel Relations , Ruth Perry looked at the makeup of the family in the early years of the novel. "Despite the emphasis," she wrote, "on marriage and motherhood in late eighteenth-century society, mothers in novels of the period are notoriously absent - dead or otherwise missing. Just when motherhood was becoming central to the definition of femininity, when the modern conception of the all-nurturing, tender, soothing, ministering mother was being consolidated in English culture, she was being represented in fiction as a memory rather than as an active present reality." In nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century fiction, the family is often broken or disturbed or exposed, and the heroine is often alone, or strangely controlled and managed. If the heroine and the narrative itself are seeking completion in her marriage, then the journey there involves either the searching for figures outside the immediate family for support, or the breaking free from members of the family who seek to confine or dictate. In creating the new family upon marriage, the heroine needs to redefine her own family or usurp its power. In attempting to dramatize this, the novelist will use a series of tricks or systems almost naturally available to Jane Austen and the novelists who came after her; they could use shadowy or absent mothers and shining or manipulative aunts. The novel in English over the nineteenth century is filled with parents whose influence must be evaded or erased to be replaced by figures who operate either literally or figuratively as aunts, both kind and mean, both well-intentioned and duplicitous, both rescuing and destroying. The novel is a form ripe for orphans, or for those whose orphanhood will be all the more powerful for being figurative, or open to the suggestion, both sweet and sour, of surrogate parents. It is easy to attribute the absence of mothers in novels of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to the large numbers of women who died in childbirth, as high as 10 per cent in the eighteenth century. The first wives of three of Jane Austen's brothers died in childbirth, for example, leaving motherless children. But this explanation is too easy. If it had suited novelists to fill their books with living mothers - Jane Austen's mother outlived her, for example - then they would have done so. In Novel Relations Ruth Perry takes the view that all the motherless heroines in the eighteenth-century novel - and all the play with substitutions - "may derive from a new necessity in an age of intensifying individualism." This necessity involved separating from the mother, or destroying her, and replacing her with a mother-figure of choice. "This mother," Perry writes, "who is also a stranger may thus enable the heroine's independent moral existence." Thus mothers get in the way in fiction; they take up the space that is better filled by indecision, by hope, by the slow growth of a personality, and by something more interesting and important as the novel itself developed. This was the idea of solitude, the idea that a key scene in a novel occurs when the heroine is alone, with no one to protect her, no one to confide in, no one to advise her, and no possibility of this. Thus her thoughts move inward, offering a drama not between generations, or between opinions, but within a wounded, deceived or conflicted self. The novel traces the mind at work, the mind in silence. The presence of a mother would be a breach of the essential privacy of the emerging self, of the sense of singleness and integrity, of an uncertain moral consciousness, of a pure and floating individuality on which the novel comes to depend. The conspiracy in the novel is thus not between a mother and her daughter, but rather between the protagonist and the reader. Jane Austen's last three novels have motherless heroines. Austen, however, does not allow this to appear as loss, or does not let this expose the heroine, or take up much of her time. Rather it increases her sense of self, it allows her personality to appear more intensely in the narrative as though slowly filling space that had been quietly and slyly left for that purpose. In Pride and Prejudice there is a mother, but there are also two aunts, Elizabeth Bennet's Aunt Gardiner and Mr. Darcy's aunt Lady Catherine de Bourgh. It is an aspect of Austen's genius that, while the novel dissolves the power and influence of the mother, neutralizes her in ways both comic and blunt, the two aunts are painted in considerably different shades, one allowed a calm, civilizing subtlety, the other given a histrionic sense of entitlement. But none of the three older women in the book has any actual power, although two of them seek power and influence; power instead is handed directly to the heroine and this power arises from the quality of her own intelligence. It is her own ability to be alone, to move alone, to be seen alone, to come to conclusions alone, that sets her apart. Excerpted from New Ways to Kill Your Mother: Writers and Their Families by Colm Tóibín All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher. Excerpted from New Ways to Kill Your Mother: Writers and Their Families by Colm Tóibín All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.