Review by Choice Review
Over the years, a series of scholars have tackled the question of what separates us, Homo sapiens, from other animal species. Differences have included tool use and language, both proven not to be exclusive to our species. Suddendorf (psychology, Univ. of Queensland, Australia) has revived the study of this exclusivity, albeit with a very sophisticated and thorough background, arguing that we have not only a better intellectual capacity but a wider range of communication methods about information and the ability to use this information to make moral judgments. He draws from research on animal cognition, cooperation, and theory of mind, as well as developmental information related to when human children develop these capacities. In order to explore the perceived intellectual gap, the author also evaluates our nearest (extinct) ancestors. This evidence is mostly about genetic relatedness and physical structure, different and not as compelling as the results of cognitive tests. But looming over all this scholarly discussion is a question: "Why bother?" It is obvious that humans are smarter than other animal species, and that technology advances our "superiority." Besides, if humans are so intellectually superior, why are people spewing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and messing up the planet? --Jennifer A. Mather, University of Lethbridge
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review
To determine what distinguishes the mental capabilities of humans from those of our closest living relatives (chimpanzees and great apes), Australian psychologist Suddendorf uses diverse data drawn from the worlds of human developmental theory, infant and child psychology, and primate ethology to walk a moderate line between "romantic" and "killjoy" interpretations of animal "behavior as an indicator of mind." He explores six realms in which human thinking appears to be qualitatively different from that of animals-"language, mental time travel, mind reading, intelligence, culture, and morality"-and finally locates the gap in the interaction between two key mental capacities: nested scenario building and the urge to connect. His analysis of the of the gap's development is much more straightforward, as he digs into evolutionary theory, molecular evidence, and the fossil record to show interbreeding and physical signs of intermediate capacities in early hominin species, positing that we Homo sapiens widened the gap by murdering our nearest evolutionary neighbors. His musings provoke thought about humanity's place in the community of life, and he considers whether a rich or lean interpretation of the inner worlds of the creatures around us serves us best. (Nov.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review
A reader-friendly examination of the great gap that exists between human beings and the rest of the animal world and an explanation of how our minds came to be unique. In his debut, Suddendorf (Psychology/Univ. of Queensland) first looks at what we have learned about the mental capacities of other primates, describing numerous experiments and both lean and rich interpretations of data. The author's words for these differing interpretations are "killjoy" and "romantic," respectively, and he takes a position midway between them. His descriptions of the many ingenious tests to assess the capabilities of various species and of human children make for fascinating reading. In language, intelligence, theory of mind, culture and morality, humans are set apart by the ability to imagine and reflect on different scenarios and by the desire to link their scenario-building minds together. Thus, while animals have communication, humans have an open-ended language; while they demonstrate problem solving, humans have abstract reasoning; while they have memory, humans have mental time travel; while they show evidence of traditions, humans have cumulative culture; and while they display empathy, humans have morality. As to how this gap came to exist, the author posits that Homo sapiens are just one branch of the various species of hominids that once existed and that our ancestors may have played a major role in eliminating their closest relatives on the family tree. "The reason the current gap between animal and human minds seems so large and so baffling, then," writes the author, "may be because we have destroyed the missing links." He warns that the gap will widen as humans drive the great apes into extinction, but in a surprisingly hopeful conclusion, he notes that humans are capable of choosing and creating a desirable future for ourselves and for our closest relatives. A fine example of science made accessible for general readers, combining history, personal anecdotes, clear accounts of research and a broad picture of human evolution.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
