Think again Contrarian reflections on life, culture, politics, religion, law, and education

Stanley Eugene Fish

Book - 2015

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

814.54/Fish
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 814.54/Fish Checked In
Subjects
Published
Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press [2015]
Language
English
Main Author
Stanley Eugene Fish (author)
Item Description
Articles originally published by the New York Times.
Physical Description
xix, 427 pages ; 25 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780691167718
  • Introduction
  • Part 1. Personal Reflections
  • 1.1. My Life Report
  • 1.2. 'Tis the Season
  • 1.3. Max the Plumber
  • 1.4. Is It Good for the Jews?
  • 1.5. My Life on the Court
  • 1.6. The Kid and Old Blue Eyes
  • 1.7. Travel Narrows
  • 1.8. I Am, Therefore I Pollute
  • 1.9. Why We Can't Just Get Along
  • 1.10. Truth and Conspiracy in the Catskills
  • 1.11. Moving On
  • Part 2. Aesthetic Reflections
  • 2.1. Why Do Writers Write?
  • 2.2. Two Aesthetics
  • 2.3. Norms and Deviations: Who's to Say?
  • 2.4. The Ten Best American Movies
  • 2.5. Giving Kim Novak Her Due
  • 2.6. Larger than Life: Charlton Heston
  • 2.7. Vengeance Is Mine
  • 2.8. Little Big Men
  • 2.9. Narrative and the Grace of God: The New True Grit
  • 2.10. Les Misérables and Irony
  • 2.11. No Way Out: 12 Years a Slave
  • 2.12. Stand Your Ground, Be a Man
  • 2.13. Country Roads
  • Part 3. Cultural Reflections
  • 3.1. Professor Sokal's Bad Joke
  • 3.2. French Theory in America
  • 3.3. Dorothy and the Tree: A Lesson in Epistemology
  • 3.4. Does Philosophy Matter?
  • 3.5. What Did Watson the Computer Do?
  • 3.6. None of the Answers: Charles Van Doren Finally Speaks, or Does He?
  • 3.7. Can I Put You on Hold?
  • 3.8. So's Your Old Man
  • 3.9. Two Cheers for Double Standards
  • 3.10. Favoritism Is Good
  • Part 4. Reflections on Politics
  • 4.1. Condemnation without Absolutes
  • 4.2. The All-Spin Zone
  • 4.3. Against Independent Voters
  • 4.4. When "Identity Politics" Is Rational
  • 4.5. Blowin' in the Wind
  • 4.6. Looking for Gas in All the Wrong Places
  • 4.7. When Principles Get in the Way
  • 4.8. Revisiting Affirmative Action, with Help from Kant
  • 4.9. Is the NRA Un-American?
  • 4.10. All You Need Is Hate
  • 4.11. How the Right Hijacked the Magic Words
  • Part 5. Reflections on the Law
  • 5.1. Why Scalia Is Right
  • 5.2. How Scalia Is Wrong
  • 5.3. Intentional Neglect
  • 5.4. What Did the Framers Have in Mind?
  • 5.5. What Is the First Amendment For?
  • 5.6. How the First Amendment Works
  • 5.7. What Does the First Amendment Protect?
  • 5.8. The First Amendment and Kittens
  • 5.9. Sticks and Stones
  • 5.10. The Harm in Free Speech
  • 5.11. Hate Speech and Stolen Valor
  • 5.12. Going in Circles with Hate Speech
  • 5.13. Our Faith in Letting It All Hang Out
  • Part 6. Reflections on Religion
  • 6.1. The Three Atheists
  • 6.2. Atheism and Evidence
  • 6.3. Is Religion Man-Made?
  • 6.4. God Talk
  • 6.5. Suffering, Evil, and the Existence of God
  • 6.6. Liberalism and Secularism: One and the Same
  • 6.7. Are There Secular Reasons?
  • 6.8. Serving Two Masters: Sharia Law and the Secular State
  • 6.9. Religion and the Liberal State Once Again
  • 6.10. Religion without Truth
  • 6.11. Is the Establishment Clause Unconstitutional?
  • 6.12. The Religion Clause Divided against Itself
  • 6.13. When Is a Cross a Cross?
  • 6.14. Being Neutral Is Oh So Hard to Do
  • Part 7. Reflections on Liberal Arts Education
  • 7.1. Why We Built the Ivory Tower
  • 7.2. There's No Business like Show Business
  • 7.3. Tip to Professors: Just Do Your Job
  • 7.4. Devoid of Content
  • 7.5. What Should Colleges Teach?
  • 7.6. Will the Humanities Save Us?
  • 7.7. The Uses of the Humanities
  • 7.8. The Value of Higher Education Made Literal
  • 7.9. A Classical Education: Back to the Future
  • 7.10. Deep in the Heart of Texas
  • 7.11. The Digital Humanities and the Transcending of Mortality
  • 7.12. Mind Your P's and B's: The Digital Humanities and Interpretation
  • Part 8. Reflections on Academic Freedom
  • 8.1. Conspiracy Theories 101
  • 8.2. Always Academicize: My Response to the Responses
  • 8.3. A Closing Argument (for Now)
  • 8.4. The Two Languages of Academic Freedom
  • 8.5. Are Academics Different?
  • 8.6. The Kushner Flap: Much Ado about Nothing
  • 8.7. Sex, the Koch Brothers, and Academic Freedom
  • 8.8. To Boycott or Not to Boycott, That Is the Question
  • 8.9. Academic Freedom against Itself: Boycotting Israeli Universities
  • 8.10. Boycotting Israeli Universities: Part 2
  • 8.11. So Long, It's Been Good to Know You
  • Acknowledgments
  • Index
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A veteran essayist for the New York Times collects some gems from his pile of preciousthough not always popularstones. Fish (Law/Florida International Univ.; Versions of Academic Freedom: From Professionalism to Revolution, 2014, etc.) has arranged his pieces thematically (see subtitle); within each category, he proceeds mostly chronologically. He claims in several places that he's more interested in presenting than in advocating issues, but this is a tad disingenuous: his attitudes generally hum like electricity, even if they are sometimes strung behind the drywall. Fish's more intimate, biographical essays compose the first section, but he's hardly hiding elsewhere. He frequently talks about his readers (and their responses, sometimes hostile), about his myriad teaching experiences, and about popular culture. There are surprises throughout. He says he really loved the recent film Les Misrables, and he calls True Grit (the Coen brothers' version) "a truly religious movie." Fish's focused sections serve both to attract and warn readers. He includes, for instance, some dense essays about legal issuesespecially involving the First Amendment, on which he is an authority)and will either delight or alarm readers with his occasional agreements with Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. The author also links stand-your-ground laws to the ethos of old Western films, including Shane. Fish lets loose on those he calls the New Atheists: Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and the late Christopher Hitchens. Basically, he calls them superficial, if not stupid. He also argues for defining academic freedom more sharply, urging teachers to discuss any issues they wantbut not to proselytize. Fish fiercely advocates for the liberal arts and disdains so-called independent voters. Like other fine essayists, he clearly identifies issues, is both analytical and tendentious (he would not confess to the latter), and will annoy readers on both sides of our current political divide. Lucid, sinewy sentences lash, tickle, and caress. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.