Peter Arno The mad, mad world of the New Yorker's greatest cartoonist

Michael Maslin

Book - 2016

In the summer of 1925, The New Yorker was struggling to survive its first year in print. They took a chance on a young, indecorous cartoonist who was about to give up his career as an artist. His name was Peter Arno, and his witty social commentary, blush-inducing content, and compositional mastery brought a cosmopolitan edge to the magazine’s pages—a vitality that would soon cement The New Yorker as one of the world’s most celebrated publications.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

741.5092/Arno
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 741.5092/Arno Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Regan Arts 2016.
Language
English
Main Author
Michael Maslin (author)
Edition
First Regan Arts hardcover edition
Physical Description
xiv, 287 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 235-242) and index.
ISBN
9781942872610
  • Peter Arno is coming
  • Something special
  • Mad at something
  • Hulabaloo:New York and the New Yorker
  • Whoops
  • T-H-A-T S-E-T
  • He/she
  • Up Broadway and down
  • Not too nude
  • "Busy doin' nothing"
  • Humorously sinster
  • Geraghty
  • I can't fight, but I can draw
  • Harold Ross: "We are pretty much at Arno's mercy"
  • Ross died
  • Hell of a way to...
  • Oh, Grow Up!
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

New Yorker cartoonist Maslin pays homage to artist Peter Arno (1904-1968) whose witty drawings created a style that's been synonymous with the New Yorker since its launch in 1925. Maslin's riveting biography is-surprisingly-the first on the rakish genius, who arguably shaped the look of the weekly magazine. Beginning with Arno's posh education at Hotchkiss and Yale, Maslin depicts the young, defiant artist (born Curtis Arnoux Peters) determined to become a cartoonist despite the strong objections of his father, a New York state supreme court judge from whom he became estranged. His first piece appeared in the 18th issue of the magazine under his pseudonym, possibly in an effort to sever ties with his father, suggests Maslin. Readers of the New Yorker in the 1920s embraced Arno's work, especially after the debut of the Whoops Sisters series, featuring two feisty old ladies who used language laced in double entendre. From 1925 to his death in 1968, with a short hiatus during WWII, the New Yorker published hundreds of Arno's drawings, many of which are reproduced in the book. Maslin fills the book with insights into the cartoonist's life and art, noting that the world he depicted on paper as well as in his messy private life reflected "the implication that something unsavory was about to take place." (Apr.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.


Review by Kirkus Book Review

The life of the once-influential cartoonist, a favorite of New Yorker readers for decades. Maslin, himself a longtime contributor of cartoons to the magazine, joins a long list of staffers and freelancers to look back longingly on the eras of Harold Ross and, after him, William Shawn and anyone who is not Tina Brown. His subject, Peter Arno (1904-1968), drew sketches and cartoons from the very beginning, way back in the Jazz Age. Maslin writes, rather too enthusiastically, "for forty-three years, from 1925 to 1968, Arno's art was as essential to The New Yorker as the Empire State Building is to the Manhattan skyline." (Ross would not have approved of the hyperbole, though Arno probably wouldn't have minded.) Arno also wrote plays, designed sets, painted, and did piles of commercial art for other clients, which caused Ross to worry. Arno, he wrote in a 1944 memo, "like the rest of the artists, is swamped with advertising work these days, and is feeling cocky and restless." In the end, Arno also drank with the copious abandon of Thurber and the other inmates, which did not serve him well. As Maslin writes, he was a man of parts; he might have been a musical star. But the author credits Arno particularly for inventing the New Yorker cartooni.e., the kind of cartoon for which the magazine would become renowned, droll and arch, dry and ironic. Although Maslin does not take this fruitful thesis as far as he might or supply much in the way of example, he does note that that Arno-esque vision is antiquated now, though all cartoonists from the start have had to ask themselves the same question from Ross and predecessors: "Is it funny?" A book that could have been funnier, though admittedly Maslin delivers more chuckles per page than Renata Adler. The book is also insightful about the workings of a magazine that is a critically important cultural institution. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.