The way of the writer Reflections on the art and craft of storytelling

Charles Johnson, 1948-

Book - 2016

"Organized into six accessible, easy-to-navigate sections, The Way of the Writer is both a literary reflection on the creative impulse and a utilitarian guide to the writing process. Johnson shares his lessons and exercises from the classroom, starting with word choice, sentence structure, and narrative voice, and delving into the mechanics of scene, dialogue, plot and storytelling before exploring the larger questions at stake for the serious writer. What separates literature from industrial fiction? What lies at the heart of the creative impulse? How does one navigate the literary world? And how are philosophy and fiction concomitant?"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

808.02/Johnson
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 808.02/Johnson Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York, NY : Scribner [2016].
Language
English
Main Author
Charles Johnson, 1948- (author)
Edition
First Scribner edition
Physical Description
xix, 233 pages ; 22 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN
9781501147210
9781501147227
  • Introduction
  • I. Who Is the Writer?
  • 1. In the Beginning...
  • 2. The Apprentice Novels
  • 3. A Day in the Life
  • 4. The Writing Space
  • 5. The Artist as Shape-Shifter
  • 6. The Question of Vision
  • II. The Process of Writing
  • 7. A Boot Camp for Creative Writing
  • 8. Words
  • 9. In Defense of Our Language
  • 10. Telling It Long and Telling It Short
  • 11. Opening Sentences: A Hundred Rays of Light
  • 12. On Craft and Revision
  • 13. The Challenge of Voice
  • 14. How We Sound
  • 15. Nature Gives Us No Metaphors
  • 16. Scene and Dialogue
  • 17. The Importance of Plot
  • 18. Storytelling and the Alpha Narrative
  • 19. On the Novel and Short Story
  • 20. The Essay
  • 21. The Risks We Take
  • III. What Helps the Writer?
  • 22. On Teachers and Mentors
  • 23. The Wounds That Create Our Work
  • 24. The First Readers
  • 25. Writers and Editors
  • 26. On Reading
  • 27. The Virtues of Journalism
  • 28. Practical Literary Advice
  • IV. The Writer as Teacher
  • 29. The Literary Duet: Creative Writing and Critical Theory
  • 30. The Creative-Writing Teacher as Soul Catcher
  • 31. Writing and Teaching, or From Mr. Hyde to Dr. Jekyll
  • V. The Writing Life and the Duties of the Writer
  • 32. The Art of Book Reviewing
  • 33. In Translation
  • 34. On Screenwriting
  • 35. Editing and Small Presses
  • VI. Philosophy and the Writer
  • 36. Writing Well Is Thinking Well
  • 37. The Writer and Philosophy
  • 38. Fiction and the Liberation of Perception
  • 39. New Fiction Novelists
  • 40. Science Fiction and the Philosophical Novel
  • 41. Sartre and the Nothingness of Being
  • 42. The Truth-Telling Power of Fiction
  • Afterword: Notes from a Former Student
  • Acknowledgments
Review by New York Times Review

Johnson's book, the record of a single year's email correspondence with his friend E. Ethelbert Miller, is a piecemeal meditation on the daily routines and mental habits of a writer. Johnson describes his study's curated clutter, his nocturnal working rhythms and the intense labor of his revisions, alongside a careful outline of a theory, reminiscent of both Aristotle and Henry James, of how plots emerge from a "ground situation." There is a winning sanity here: Johnson wants his students to be "raconteurs always ready to tell an engaging tale," not self-preoccupied neurotics. The book raises sociological questions. Johnson has spent three decades as a teacher of writing at the University of Washington, though he himself had no such training, and he has fascinatingly conflicted thoughts on the teaching of creative labor. He praises the virtues of his own education in academic philosophy and daily journalism, while defending the possibility that writing programs can rigorously and unsentimentally improve an author's technique. Where the book radiates warmth, however, is in its continual return to Johnson's mentors, from an inspiring high school writing teacher, Marie-Claire Davis, to his longtime friend the novelist John Gardner. Gardner in particular is quoted at length. A writer's true education might start in institutions, it seems, but for Johnson it is more a lineage of good, memorable talk, which is an uneasy fit with the formalities of the classroom. NICHOLAS DAMES teaches at Columbia University and is the author, most recently, of "The Physiology of the Novel: Reading, Neural Science, and the Form of Victorian Fiction."

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [December 11, 2016]
Review by Booklist Review

National Book Award winner Johnson (Middle Passage, 1990) has taught creative writing for over 30 years and now shares his well-refined thoughts on how best to develop literary taste and technique. Johnson is largely self-taught, having written six practice novels before his first published novel and never taking (or wanting to take) a creative-writing class. His pedagogy here is fairly traditional, a combination of writing exercises designed to build strength and flexibility, and structured appreciation of great writers as an aid to finding one's own voice. He recommends reading dictionaries, laments the truncated language we find on Twitter, and discourages the study of second-rate writers. Every aspect of this writing manual, which is laced with memoir, illustrates Johnson's seriousness of purpose about literature and his laser focus on the thousands of small choices that shape a written work. The result is a book that will be appreciated by aspiring writers and everyone who shares Johnson's delight in the power of words.--Driscoll, Brendan Copyright 2016 Booklist

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

National Book Award-winner Johnson (Taming the Ox) here collects enlightening but somewhat snobby essays about his process and his ideas about literature and writing. Johnson starts off by proclaiming, "One must begin with a genuine love of art." Though he says "rigid formulas and rules" aren't helpful, this doesn't stop him from making more than a few uncharitable comments about the value of genre fiction. Additionally, his description of his desired reader-"intelligent, learned, and sophisticated"-might alienate readers who suspect he isn't referring to them. Johnson's writing style here is unvarnished. As he explains, he views essays primarily as ways of answering questions, and his interest in reaching those answers animates his nonfiction more than the prose does. Johnson's process, from morning exercises to writing for several hours a day, is fascinating to read about up to a point, but is detailed ad nauseam. Perhaps the most deeply felt passages are those dealing with Johnson's mentor, novelist John Gardner (Grendel), whose lessons and friendship Johnson clearly cherished. Johnson's absolute statements will turn off some readers, and there are a handful of essays that feel like afterthoughts. Still, there are valuable insights to be gleaned about writing and reading and the work that goes into both. (Dec.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

National Book Award winner Johnson (Middle Passage) draws on his 33 years of teaching writing and a lifetime of thinking about creativity to offer this guide for aspiring authors. Blending practical exercises and advice along with a meditation on artistic process, he illustrates the craftsmanship involved in good storytelling. Also emphasized is the importance of language, from word choice to the construction of sentences and paragraphs that read like poetry. In his own writing, Johnson revises until he determines that each word and sentence is essential to the story, discarding many earlier versions, a strategy he refers to as sculpting. Examples from many literary and artistic works illustrate his points. The author's academic training in philosophy and his practice of Buddhism inform his reflections as well as the role of the writer in society. VERDICT All writers will welcome the useful tips and exercises, but the book will also appeal to readers interested in literature and the creative process. Johnson's wonderful prose will engage readers to think more deeply about how to tell a story and consider the truth-telling power of the arts.-Judy Solberg, Sacramento, CA © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A pithy guide for writers and those who teach them.In a series of short essays, Johnson (Emeritus, Creative Writing/Univ. of Washington; Taming the Ox: Buddhist Stories and Reflections on Politics, Race, Culture, and Spiritual Practice, 2014, etc.), a MacArthur fellow and winner of the National Book Award, Writers Guild Award, and many other honors, draws on his experience as a writer (of novels, essays, screenplays, and philosophy); editor (of the Seattle Review); fiction judge for the National Book Award (twice), PEN/Faulkner Award, Los Angeles Times Book Award, and Pulitzer Prize; and longtime teacher and mentor to offer practical advice on the writing process and the writing life. Although he refers frequently to his mentor John Gardnera bluff, combustible, and brilliant teacher Johnson admits that he never took a college writing workshop and, in fact, looked on them with disdain. To my eye, he writes, they were dominated by the instructors personality and unsolicited political opinions, and took an approach that was highly subjective, encouraging immature students to write about what they know. When he took on the task of teaching creative writing, he designed his workshops to be demanding, with rigorous exercises meant to free students from solipsism. A Boot Camp for Creative Writing offers examples of those exercises; Opening Sentences: A Hundred Rays of Light includes examples of admirable first lines from mostly canonical novels, including Moby-Dick, Kafkas The Trial, and Toni Morrisons Beloved. Echoing many other writing guides, Johnson focuses on the power of precise words, the importance of developing voice, and the joys and challenges of revision. Sometimes, he admits, my ratio of throwaway to keep pages is 20:1. Revision, he adds, is a combination of cutting away (like sculpting the sentence from stone) and also a constant layering of the language (like working with the sentence as you would clay). Throughout, Johnsons voice is generous and warm, even while he is cautioning writers to be their own ruthless editors. A useful writing guide from an experienced practitioner. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

The Way of the Writer 1. In the Beginning . . . People sometimes wonder what a person was like before he or she became a writer. What was that person's childhood like? In my case, I imagine that my being an only child growing up in the 1950s in the Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, in the shadow of Northwestern University, shaped my life in more ways than I can imagine. I was born on April 23 (Shakespeare's birthday), 1948, at a place I described in my novel Dreamer: Community Hospital, an all-black facility. In my novel I renamed this important institution "Neighborhood Hospital," and called the woman who spearheaded its creation, Dr. Elizabeth Hill, by the fictionalized name Jennifer Hale. In the late 1940s, Dr. Hill--one of Evanston's first black physicians--was barred by segregation from taking her patients to all-white Evanston Hospital. Instead, she was forced to take them to a hospital on the South Side of Chicago, and quite a few of her patients died in the ambulance on the way. Almost single-handedly (or so I was told as a child), Dr. Hill organized black Evanstonians (and some sympathetic whites) to create a black hospital. Our family patriarch, my great-uncle William Johnson, whose all-black construction crew (the Johnson Construction Co., which this book honors on its title page) built churches, apartment buildings, and residences all over the North Shore area, would go nowhere else for treatment, even after Evanston Hospital was integrated in the 1950s. And every black baby born to my generation in Evanston came into the world there--my classmates and I all had in common the fact that we had been delivered by Elizabeth Hill. She considered us her "children." Even when I was in my early twenties she knew me by sight and would ask what I'd been up to since I last saw her. Predictably, then, I grew up in a black community in the 1950s that had the feel of one big, extended family. Ebenezer A.M.E. Church, where I was baptized (and later my son) and married, was a central part of our collective lives. In an atmosphere such as this, everybody knew their neighbors and saw them in church on Sunday; it was natural for grown-ups to keep an eye on the welfare of their neighbors' children and to help each other in innumerable ways. In short, Evanston in the 1950s was a place where, beyond all doubt, I knew I was loved and belonged. My father worked up to three jobs to ensure our family never missed a meal. We weren't poor, but neither were we wealthy or middle-class. Every so often my mother took a job to help make ends meet, including one at Gamma Phi Beta sorority at Northwestern University, where she worked as a cleaning woman during the Christmas holidays. She brought me along to help because she couldn't afford a babysitter. I remember her telling me that the sorority's chapter said no blacks or Jews would ever be admitted into its ivied halls. My mother brought home boxes of books thrown out by the sorority girls when classes ended, and in those boxes I found my first copies of Mary Shelley and Shakespeare. I read them, determined that the privileged girls of that sorority would never be able to say they knew something about the Bard that the son of their holiday cleaning woman didn't. Decades later in 1990 Northwestern's English department actively and generously pursued me for employment by offering me a chair in the humanities, which I declined. Along with those books from Northwestern, my mother filled our home with books that reflected her eclectic tastes in yoga, dieting, Christian mysticism, Victorian poetry, interior decorating, costume design, and flower arrangement. On boiling hot Midwestern afternoons in late July when I was tired of drawing (my dream was to become a cartoonist and illustrator), I would pause before one of her many bookcases and pull down a volume on religion, the Studs Lonigan trilogy, poetry by Rilke, The Swiss Family Robinson, Richard Wright's Black Boy, an 1897 edition of classic Christian paintings (all her books are now in my library), or Daniel Blum's Pictorial History of the American Theatre 1900-1956, which fascinated me for hours. She was always in book clubs, and I joined one, too, to receive monthly new works of science fiction when I was in my middle teens. (Believe it or not, I had a hardcover first edition of Philip K. Dick's The Man in the High Castle, which I've always regretted letting slip away from me.) As an only child, books became my replacement for siblings. Exposed to so many realms of the imagination, I vowed to read at least one book a week after I started at Evanston Township High School (from which, by the way, my mother had graduated in the late thirties). I started with adventure stories like those by Ian Fleming and ended my senior year with Plutarch's Lives of the Noble Grecians. I spent hours each week at a newsstand selecting the next paperback I'd spend several days of my life with. And, as might be expected, it happened that one week I finished early--on a Tuesday, I recall--and I thought, "God, what do I do now with the rest of the week?" So I read a second book. Then it became easy to make it three books a week, and I did think--but only once--that someday it might be nice to have my name on the spine of a volume I'd written. And so, again, ours was a house not just of provocative books but also inexpensive and intriguing (to me) art objects that Mother found at flea markets and rummage sales. When she couldn't find them, she built them--for example, wall shelves with interesting designs to hold small figurines. We'd read the same books together sometimes, Mother and me, and discuss them. I think she relied on me for this, even raised me to do it, since my hardworking father had little time for books. She had the soul of an actress, a biting wit, and loved art. She'd always wanted to be a teacher, but couldn't because she suffered from severe bouts of asthma. So she made me her student. Like so many other things I owe to my mother, I am indebted to her for seducing me with the beauty of blank pages--a diary she gave me to record my thoughts. But this was by no means a new infatuation. As with books, it was into drawing that I regularly retreated as a child. There was something magical to me about bringing forth images that hitherto existed only in my head where no one could see them. I remember spending whole afternoons blissfully seated before a three-legged blackboard my parents got me for Christmas, drawing and erasing until my knees and the kitchen floor beneath me were covered with layers of chalk and the piece in my hand was reduced to a wafer-thin sliver. Something to understand about Evanston in the 1950s and '60s is that, unlike many places, the public schools were integrated. From the time I started kindergarten I was thrown together with kids of all colors, and I found it natural to have friends both black and white. Evanston Township High School, we were constantly reminded, was, at the time, rated the best public high school in the nation. It was a big school, almost like a small college--my graduating class had almost a thousand students; black students made up 11 percent of that population. In its progressive curriculum we found an education provided, clearly, by the wealthy white Evanston parents who sent their children there. I took advantage of all the art and photography, literature and history classes. And to its credit, ETHS offered a yearly creative-writing class taught by the short-story writer Marie-Claire Davis. At the time she was publishing in the Saturday Evening Post. As an aspiring cartoonist, I thought writing stories was fun and I came alive in my literature classes, where we read Orwell, Shakespeare, Melville, and Robert Penn Warren, but writing wasn't the kick for me that drawing was. Regardless, I let a buddy talk me into enrolling in Marie's class with him. We talked to each other the whole time and barely listened to poor Marie. But she put Joyce Cary's lovely book Art and Reality in front of us, without discussing it in class, and with the hope that we might read it on our own, which I did, and something in me so enjoyed his essays on art and aesthetics that I thought, yes, someday I'd like to do a book like this, too. (You might say you're holding that book in your hands right now.) When I turned in my three stories for Marie's class in 1965, she rushed them into print in the literary section of our school's newspaper (with my illustrations), which she supervised. I always feel indebted to her. And so in the 1990s I established an award, the Marie-Claire Davis Award, at the high school--$500 for the best senior student portfolio of creative writing. For years before her death, Marie would travel from Florida to shake the hand of the winner of that award. Inevitably, the passion for drawing led me to consider a career as a professional artist. From the Evanston Public Library I lugged home every book on drawing, cartooning, and illustration, and collections of early comic art (Cruikshank, Thomas Rowlandson, Daumier, Thomas Nast), and pored over them, considering what a wonderful thing it would be--as an artist--to externalize everything I felt and thought in images. Some Saturday mornings I sat on the street downtown with my sketchbook, trying to capture the likenesses of buildings and pedestrians. And I made weekly trips to Good's Art Supplies to buy illustration board with my allowance and money earned from my paper route (and later from a Christmas job working nights until dawn on the assembly line at a Rand McNally book factory in Skokie, and from still another tedious after-school job cleaning a silks-and-woolens store where well-heeled white women did their shopping). Good's was a little store packed to the ceiling with the equipment--the tools--I longed to buy. The proprietor, a fat, friendly man, tolerated my endless and naïve questions about what it was like to be an artist and what materials were best for what projects; he showed me a book he'd self-published on his theory of perspective (I never bought it), and after he'd recommended to me the best paper for my pen-and-ink ambitions, I strapped my purchase onto the front of my bicycle and pedaled home. For a Christmas present my folks finally did buy me one of Good's drawing tables, new for $25. I made space for it in my bedroom and set it up like a shrine. That table would carry me through two years of drawing furiously for my high school newspaper (my senior year, in 1966, I received two second-place awards in the sports and humor divisions for a comic strip and panel from the Columbia Scholastic Press Association's national contest for high school cartoonists), through my first professional job as an illustrator when I was seventeen--drawing for the catalog of a magic-trick company in Chicago. And then that first drawing table was with me, like an old friend, for the next four years of college when I drew thousands of panel cartoons, political cartoons, illustrations (even the design for a commemorative stamp), and every kind of visual assignment for my college newspaper, for the Chicago Tribune (where I interned in 1969, then worked for as a stringer when I returned to college), for a newspaper in southern Illinois, and for many magazines known as the "black press" in that era: Jet, Ebony, Black World (né Negro Digest), and Players (a black version of Playboy), all of which culminated in 1970 when I was twenty-two years old with an early PBS drawing show, Charlie's Pad, that I created, hosted, and co-produced. After that early, exhaustive seven-year career, I was ready to start writing fiction full-time. To tell stories with words and not just visual images. Excerpted from The Way of the Writer: Reflections on the Art and Craft of Storytelling by Charles Johnson All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.