Private government How employers rule our lives (and why we don't talk about it)

Elizabeth Anderson, 1959-

Book - 2017

Based on two lectures given in 2014 by the author during the Tanner Lectures on Human Values delivered at Princeton University, followed by four commentaries by eminent scholars and the author's response to the commentators. Anderson questions the authoritarian control workers have been forced to give to their employers in order to remain employed and historically why this goes against American ideology of free market values.

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

331.256/Anderson
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 331.256/Anderson Checked In
Subjects
Published
Princeton ; Oxford : Princeton University Press [2017]
Language
English
Main Author
Elizabeth Anderson, 1959- (author)
Other Authors
Stephen Macedo, 1957- (writer of introduction)
Physical Description
xxiii, 196 pages ; 23 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 145-181) and index.
ISBN
9780691176512
  • Introduction
  • Author's Preface
  • 1. When the Market Was "Left"
  • 2. Private Government
  • Comments
  • 3. Learning from the Levellers?
  • 4. Market Rationalization
  • 5. Help Wanted: Subordinates
  • 6. Work Isn't So Bad after All
  • Response
  • 7. Reply to Commentators
  • Notes
  • Contributors
  • Index
Review by Choice Review

This book develops the thesis that a significant portion of the US work force is mistreated and dominated by owners and bosses with arbitrary powers similar to authoritarian governments. The beginning chapters develop this case, and later chapters include responses from scholars in social science and philosophy. The historical debate is important in sorting out whether the economic optimism of Adam Smith and other Enlightenment thinkers is relevant to labor's situation in the modern economy. Anderson suggests that individual, entrepreneurial, small-scale production has evolved into large corporate enterprises that leave laborers in bondage with little hope of meaningful change. The comments section questions whether workers are seriously mistreated because turnover, regulations, constitutional rights, and worker voice options limit employer power. Anderson responds with data and counterarguments to confirm her thesis. A reader might benefit from reviewing this final response chapter first because it includes the data hoped for earlier and alerts one to the key issues explored in the earlier chapters. Overall, this is a well-documented, captivating discussion that should be addressed in an interdisciplinary manner, and an excellent starting point to make that happen. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. --James Halteman, Wheaton College

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.