Almost everything Notes on hope

Anne Lamott

Large print - 2018

"I am stockpiling antibiotics for the apocalypse, even as I await the blossoming of paperwhites on the windowsill in the kitchen," Anne Lamott admits at the beginning of Almost Everything. Despair and uncertainty surround us: in the headlines, in our families, and in ourselves. But even when life is at its bleakest--when everything makes us feel, as Lamott puts it, "doomed, stunned, exhausted, and overly caffeinated" --the seeds of rejuvenation are at hand. "All truth is paradox," Lamott writes, "and this turns out to be a reason for hope. If you arrive at a place in life that is miserable, it will change." That is the time when we must pledge, she says, "not to give up, but to do what Wendell Ba...rry wrote: 'Be joyful, though you have considered all the facts.'" Lamott calls for all of us to rediscover the nuggets of hope and wisdom that are buried in us that will make tomorrow better than today. Divided into short chapters that explore life's essential truths as she sees them-- "Almost everything will work again if you unplug it for a few minutes. Including you" --Lamott pinpoints these moments of insight and shines an encouraging light forward."--Page [4] of cover.

Saved in:

1st floor Show me where

LARGE PRINT/170.44/Lamott
0 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
1st floor LARGE PRINT/170.44/Lamott Due Dec 20, 2024
Subjects
Genres
Large type books
Published
[New York] : Random House Large Print [2018]
Language
English
Main Author
Anne Lamott (author)
Edition
First large print edition
Physical Description
240 pages (large print) ; 21 cm
ISBN
9781984827609
  • Prelude
  • Puzzles
  • Inside job
  • Humans 101
  • Unplugged
  • Don't let them get you to hate them
  • Writing
  • Bitter truth
  • In the garden
  • Hands of time
  • Jah
  • Food
  • Famblies
  • Coda: Hope.
Review by New York Times Review

KEEPING AT IT By Paul A. Volcker with Christine Harper. (PublicAffairs, $28.) Volcker was chairman of the Federal Reserve through most of the 1980s, a period of American prosperity. In this memoir, he recounts his life story as well as the economic booms and busts he has seen along the way. IN MY FATHER'S HOUSE By Fox Butterfield. (Knopf, $26.95.) Finding a unique way to examine the issue of mass incarceration in the United States, Butterfield, a Pulitzer Prize-winning former Times reporter, delves into the experience of one family, the Bogles, and how prison has become a legacy for them passed from parents to children over multiple generations. CHRONIQUES By Kamel Daoud. (Other Press, $28.95.) Daoud is the francophone journalist and author of "The Meursault Investigation," which retold the story of Albert Camus's "The Stranger." In this collection of his columns from the Algerian newspaper Le Quotidien d'Oran, he writes about the trials and tribulations of Arab society teetering between change and entrenchment. ALMOST EVERYTHING By Anne Lamott. (Riverhead, $20.) Lamott seeks reasons for hopefulness at a moment when, like many of us, she finds herself most often "doomed, stunned, exhausted and overcaffeinated." WHY JOURNALISM STILL MATTERS By Michael Schudson. (Polity, paper, $22.95.) One of the most important media scholars of our time, Schudson approaches the business of making news from a sociological and historical perspective, offering a new way to think of questions that bedevil us every day "As a White House correspondent specializing in foreign policy, I've written dozens of stories about how the United States confronts - or more often, fails to confront - the horrors of civil war in Syria, Yemen, Libya and elsewhere. Mohsin Hamid's slender novel EXIT WEST takes the geopolitics out of war completely - it doesn't even name the country being ravaged - and views it purely through the lens of a young couple, Nadia and Saeed, who fall in love among the ruins. The language is spare and unsentimental; Hamid follows the young couple to bleak refugee camps in Mykonos, London and Marin County, Calif. (he names those places, sketching out a dystopian portrait of a world coping with a mass-migration future). Nadia and Saeed are brave, heartbreaking and utterly credible. But they make their journey around the world by passing through mysterious black doorways - an abrupt turn to magical realism that has leftsome readers puzzled. I think it captures how quickly, in an era of mass mobility and digital communications, the victims of distant wars can end up on the West's doorstep." - MARK LANDLER, WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT, ON WHAT HE'S READING.

Copyright (c) The New York Times Company [July 11, 2019]
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Lamott (Hallelujah, Anyway) shares wisdom on truth and paradox in this comforting book of reflections inspired by the current social and political climate. "In general, it doesn't feel like the light is making a lot of progress," she writes. Each brief essay explores a theme or topic such as hope, love, or faith with Lamott's customary optimism. In the opening essay, "Puzzles," she sets the stage for the book by considering the physics of light, which is both particle and wave, as an example of how paradox can be the seed of truth. "Almost every facet of my meager maturation and spiritual understanding," she writes, "has sprung from hurt, loss, and disaster." Fans of Lamott will find her deeply personal, honest yet humorous style on full display and those same fans will also recognize some familiar material, such as the "bird by bird" story that she uses to encapsulate the writing life. There is no doubt of Lamott's brilliance, but this collection rings of speed rather than depth, with some of the essays ("Bitter Truth" and "Hands of Time") reading like series of aphorisms and lacking narrative cohesion. Though the book is clearly written to capitalize on the present political moment, its brevity makes it a useful introduction to Lamott's work and philosophy for any interested novitiate. (Oct.) c Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

Lamott (Hallelujah Anyway: Rediscovering Mercy) dedicates this book to her niece and grandson, stating that she will attempt to record all that she knows about everything in order to provide them with guidance in their lives. This leads to a rather disordered presentation that pings from topic to topic, mixing seriousness with casual offhand asides. Lamott addresses the overwhelming feelings of despair and uncertainty caused by modern life and offers advice on how to combat them with a combination of religion, spirituality, positivity, humor, and learning. She never glosses over the difficulties of everyday existence; indeed, she seems to find life to be a general cause of tremendous stress and sorrow. However, she also is able to see the joys in many things, given time to fight against her darker feelings. -Lamott always does the unexpected-a chapter on God is mostly devoted to a friend who is an avowed atheist. While Lamott is clearly Christian, she is open to other religions and explores them for possible nuggets of wisdom. One suspects this is probably a better read than listen, largely because the author is the narrator. Unfortunately, -Lamott's diction is poor and her pacing leaves much to be desired. She has a lot of one-liners in the book that fall totally flat in her monotone delivery. -VERDICT Established fans of Lamott's will likely enjoy this work, but the scattershot organization and less than stellar narration may leave others cold.-B. Allison Gray, Goleta Valley Lib., CA © Copyright 2019. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Another distillation of the author's life philosophy.As a gift to her grandson and niece, novelist and nonfiction writer Lamott (Hallelujah Anyway: Rediscovering Mercy, 2017; etc.) sets out to record "everything I know about almost everything." The result is an obsessively inward-focusing hodgepodge of life stories, advice, and ramblings. Though hope is the author's tagline and even the title of her concluding chapter, readers find her struggling through virtually every life event, buried in anxieties. Lamott explains early on that she was struck to hear a child say the words, "I has [sic] value." She realized that it "would have completely changed my life had I heard and internalized [that idea] as a child." The incident serves to clarify the author's central struggle: a lifelong search for self-value. Her writing cries out for an internal peace she cannot find. In a chapter on family, she focuses mainly on conflict with her uncle, whom she once called "a scumbutt" in a moment of anger, which affected her for decades. In a chapter on God, which the author defines in a number of nebulous ways, she focuses on an atheist friend who committed suicide. Another chapter is centered entirely around dieting and body image, revealing another self-esteem pitfall, and Lamott devotes an entire chapter to her unabashed hatred of Donald Trumpthough she refuses to use his name, as if she were discussing Voldemort. The author's view of life is often depressing; she refers to it as "this sometimes grotesque amusement park," and she answers the question, "how did we all get so screwed up?" with, "life just damages people. There is no way around this. Not all the glitter and concealer in the world can cover it up."Those who enjoy Lamott's consistently self-deprecating humor, vulnerability, and occasional nuggets of positivity will enjoy her latest; others will be adrift. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

one   Puzzles   All truth is paradox. Everything true in the world has innate contradictions. "I know one thing, that I know nothing," Socrates said.   This is distressing to those of us who would prefer a more orderly and predictable system, where you could say and prove that certain things are true, and that their opposites are false. Is this so much to ask? Paradox doesn't always work for me (okay, never), even though I believe both that we are doomed and that life is a magical, mystical gift. I love it here, love my life, though sometimes it has been devastating and sometimes, politically, a fever dream.   Life is taxing enough at its most predictable, but you can't bank on anything. For example, we learned as children that light is particles, and in a predictable world we would all still agree that since light obviously is particles, like grains of sand, we could all get on with our lives and maybe get the cat a flea dip later. But then you have annoying people who say and can prove that light is also waves, like undulations of water.   The paradox is that both of these are true and they're both true at the same time.   But if both aspects of light are true, then why have they never been observed together in the same room at the same time? (The old Batman/Bruce Wayne question.) If it were left to me, one camp would just give in and say, "Okay, light is particles," or "Fine, have it your way, light is waves."   Maybe life and light are both like that, two mints in one.   How is thinking about this at all helpful to my tiny princess self? It upends my best thinking, and my natural response is to mock it. So what if the only constant is change? Why bother touching up your roots? What if Mother Teresa was right that "if you love until it hurts, there can be no more hurt, only more love"? I don't want to hurt more. I have hurt plenty; I'm good on hurt. Ix-nay on more urt-hay.   But almost every facet of my meager maturation and spiritual understanding has sprung from hurt, loss, and disaster. Is it true that the more you give, the richer you are? Do you want my mailing address? Is being born a death sentence-are we, as Beckett said, born astride the grave? If we are born to eternal life, did we already have the good parts that were in process before we existed, where possibly they served dessert with breakfast? These are the questions that keep me up at night.   Paradox means you have to be able to keep two wildly different ideas in your head at the same time. This is one too many for some people, including me on bad days, and sometimes our fearless leaders. I prefer bumper stickers. I really do. "If you lived in your heart, you'd be home now" is all I need as a life philosophy, as I barely avoid smashing into the host bumper it is pasted onto.   But all truth really is paradox, and this turns out to be a reason for hope. If you arrive at a place in life that is miserable, it will change, and something else about it will also be true. So paradox is an invitation to go deeper into life, to see a bigger screen, instead of the nice, safe lower left quadrant where you see work, home, and the country. Try a wider reality, through curiosity, awareness, and breath. Try actually being here. What a concept.   The medieval German mystic Meister Eckhart said that if the soul could have known God without the world, God never would have created the world. Paradox is an invitation to know the soul of your own cranky stubborn baby self, and of the sublime. One of the passengers on the famous US Airways Flight 1549 that crash-landed on the Hudson River in 2009 was asked afterward how he felt, and he said, "I was alive before, but now I'm really alive." This is the invitation.   Jesus was a rabbi, schooled by rabbis, who thought like rabbis. Rabbis, upon being asked a question by a disciple, usually answer with a paradoxical inquiry or a story. This can be annoying and time-consuming for those of us looking for neat, simple answers. But truth is too wild and complex to be contained in one answer, so Jesus often responded with a question or a parable.   Most parables are paradoxical in that they don't go the ways you think they will. Jesus is messing with people's minds, paradoxically out of love, so they dig deeper into truth, where they may find themselves, and love, which is the kingdom.   Take any of Jesus' parables. There's the one about a vineyard owner who goes out all day and hires people, each for the standard daily wage, no matter how many hours they work. At quitting time, he gives the last ones hired the daily wage; but then he also gives the people who've worked the longest the same wage. Of course those who've worked the longest kvetch up a storm. I would have. I'd definitely be bitter. Here's the paradox: The owner notes that each of them got what they'd been promised, i.e., enough, the standard daily wage. Why would anybody-like, say, an addict-want more than enough?   No one you know, I'm sure.   Each of us wants so much assurance, and there really isn't much. We religious types think God's love, closeness, and grace are the answers to all of life's pain and general horribleness. But then something bad happens to our children or our health. A young sober woman of my acquaintance who survived a grueling battle with oral cancer, losing part of her tongue in the process, had been in remission for a couple of years and then shared in a gathering that the cancer had returned. She would need more chemo. Everyone began the litany of stunned encouragement, of knowing someone's aunt's beautician who'd had the same prognosis and was still alive, but the young woman waved it all away like smoke.   "Oh, God's got it," she said cheerfully. I wear these words on a necklace. I believe this with all my heart, but at the same time I also believe in science and chemo.   I once saw on YouTube a home movie of a five-year-old girl sobbing beside her baby brother, who is sitting up with the slight rolling motion of an inflatable Bop clown. She alternately sobs to the camera that she doesn't want him to get older, then stops to cuddle him, gazing at him like a suitor and voicing tenderly that she loves him so much, he is the most precious baby in the world, then sobs that she doesn't want to die when she's a hundred, then cuddles him and gushes that she loves his little smiles. I think this pretty much says it. We are consumed by the most intense love for one another and the joy of living, along with the grief and terror that we and our babies will know unbelievable hurt: broken bones, bad boyfriends, old age.   We live one day at a time, knowing it's over too soon, in what feels like about eighteen years, seven months. Zzzzzzzip. Time for a nice catheter and heart pills. Every day we're in the grip of the impossible conundrum: the truth that it's over in a blink, and we may be near the end, and that we have to live as if it's going to be okay, no matter what. Niels Bohr wrote, "The opposite of a true statement is a false statement, but the opposite of a profound truth can be another profound truth."   We think we know what we know, and we love this so much, no matter what Socrates thought. We like to think we stand on the truth, that the ground beneath our feet is stable, moored, which totally works for me. But is it? In the San Francisco Bay Area? Really?   Yet the blessing of knowing that you don't know is to get gently busted. We may not actually want to know this, but we don't have a choice. It is the same feeling when I hit the wrong button on my phone and all the app icons wiggle and jiggle concurrently in what some of us more inept, possibly older people experience as taunting. Entering into paradox, and thus mystery, can be just as overwhelming. But this is also where new beginnings and hope emerge, side by side with the dark and scrambled.   Some characters in fiction and our families exist as levers, to turn everything upside down and thereby knock out of the park some of our old presumptions, pretensions, convictions, and illusions of safety. These people, both in fiction and at the holiday table, tend to be annoying and on the margins. No one is touching their hems. Just the opposite, in fact. We laugh at them, roll our eyes inwardly, and try to figure out a way not to have to sit next to them.   Someone with whom I was in love felt it made sense to criticize my son to me, to Armed Tense Mother Bear, over the phone, unsolicited and in great detail, out of the blue, and express judgment about his character and parenting. My reaction was instant, weaponized love for my son-and so I withheld from this person my affection and the invitation to my heart, let alone my bed. Forget letting go and letting God. It was time for brooding, stewing, victimized self-righteousness, and thoughts of revenge. Now you're talking.   I told him coldly, "You've hurt me, and our whole family, by having these bad secret judgments all along. You've sullied us, and our home."   First he tried to explain that I was misinterpreting his attack on my son, as he really wanted to help him become a better father. This is a wonderful and honest man, but I didn't buy it, and I said so.   He asked what I thought he should do. I said, with decades of therapy and church behind me, that there was nothing he could do. Ever.   He went off to think this over. The next day, he asked me again.   I said, "You need to make this right." And he agreed to do that.   I prayed and cried and came to sort of believe that he was perfect and also an asshat, and that I am, too. Then the next day, when he came over to talk, I was packing heat. We spoke for a few minutes, although I didn't feel like talking, but in a crazy subconscious martial arts move, God or Holy Spirit or Coyote Trickster intervened and I found myself inviting him along to Home Depot, where I had some errands to do. Home Depot, where they fix things and make things right.   He came along, and he began to make things right by listening, finding in himself the willingness to look at his own stuff, and change, at my house, with my son.   Since then, we love and trust each other more than we already did.   When we are stuck in our convictions and personas, we enter into the disease of having good ideas and being right. My Jesuit friend Tom used to say that he never noticed what he was feeling; only that he was right. We think we have a lock on truth, with our burnished surfaces and articulation, but the bigger we pump ourselves up, the easier we are to prick with a pin. And the bigger we get, the harder it is to see the earth under our feet.   We all know the horror of having been Right with a capital R, feeling the surge of a cause, whether in politics or custody disputes. This rightness is so hot and steamy and exciting, until the inevitable rug gets pulled out from under us. Then we get to see that we almost never really know what is true, except what everybody else knows: that sometimes we're all really lonely, and hollow, and stripped down to our most naked human selves.   It is the worst thing on earth, this truth about how little truth we know. I hate and resent it. And yet it is where new life rises from.   New life is uncomfortable, nubbly. We like soft and warm. Baby blankets are nice. We also like to wear the fleecy cloak we've made for ourselves, the finery of being right.   Why would you take off the cloak voluntarily? It's so comfortable and impressive, at least to you. You let it drop or life yanks it off, and when you notice it's gone, it doesn't feel great. You begin to feel the cold, prickly wind, and people can see your veiny ankles.   But what comes in is fresh air on our skin, which startles us awake. We'll never again be as open and vibrational as babies, but maybe now we'll be a little more present and aware.   The forty-three people who died in the catastrophic fires in Santa Rosa, California, in 2017 lost everything. The survivors lost almost as much: their homes, gardens, friends, property, pets. But they had one another. They had life. And they had us-shabby, busy us. The fire was a sword that cut away all the comfort and treasure in life, the illusion of the solidity of objects, which turns out not to be so solid after all.   We saw devastation, of course, but we also witnessed holiness in the burned world and what was left standing-a fireplace, a heavily laden persimmon tree, pallets of bottled water from out of state, the sky. We saw humanity.   Don't get me wrong-it sucked. I know I would grieve and wail forever if this happened to me. But I would be mistaken. I would come through, via friends, community, love, grace, relief efforts. We are flattened, we come through.   Usually this holiness takes a backseat to our toxic self-obsessed nattering monkey minds. But in the Wine Country, when so much was burned and chopped away, when people's hearts pounded with fear, when their breath constricted with loss, there was another heart beating with them-ours. Another breath was with them, and there were hands to hold. Such beautiful comfort, the holy form, the only comfort there really is-the heart, a breath, a hand. It is not the comfort I would choose, but the survivors found themselves surrounded with solace, with food, clothing, art supplies for their kids. (And sports bras! Relief organizations asked for new sports bras, instead of our armpitty discards, which many women were donating with good intentions. My son bought $200 worth of sports bras. Try explaining that to your accountant.) The survivors were alive, and aliveness is sacred. Excerpted from Almost Everything: Notes on Hope by Anne Lamott All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.