Reign of terror How the 9/11 era destabilized America and produced Trump

Spencer Ackerman

Book - 2021

"An examination of the profound impact that the War on Terror had in pushing American politics and society in an authoritarian direction for an entire generation, at home and abroad, the United States has waged an endless conflict known as the War on Terror. In addition to multiple ground wars, it has pioneered drone strikes and industrial-scale digital surveillance, as well as detaining people indefinitely and torturing them. These conflicts have yielded neither peace nor victory, but they have transformed America. What began as the persecution of Muslims and immigrants has become a normalized, paranoid feature of American politics and security, expanding the possibilities for applying similar or worse measures against other targets a...t home. A politically divided country turned the War on Terror into a cultural and then tribal struggle, first on the ideological fringes and ultimately expanding to conquer the Republican Party, often with the timid acquiescence of the Democratic Party. Today's nativist resurgence walked through a door opened by the 9/11 era. Reign of Terror will show how these policies created a foundation for American authoritarianism and, though it is not a book about Donald Trump, it will provide a critical explanation of his rise to power and the sources of his political strength. It will show that Barack Obama squandered an opportunity to dismantle the War on Terror after killing Osama bin Laden. That mistake turns out to have been portentous. By the end of his tenure, the war metastasized into a broader and bitter culture struggle in search of a demagogue like Trump to lead it. A union of journalism and intellectual history, Reign of Terror will be a pathbreaking and definitive book with the power to transform how America understands its national security policies and their catastrophic impact on its civic life"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

973.931/Ackerman
2 / 2 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 973.931/Ackerman Checked In
2nd Floor 973.931/Ackerman Checked In
Subjects
Published
[New York] : Viking [2021]
Language
English
Main Author
Spencer Ackerman (author)
Physical Description
xviii, 428 pages ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 345-416) and index.
ISBN
9781984879776
  • Introduction: Neither Peace nor Victory
  • Prologue The Worst Terrorist Attack in American History
  • Chapter 1. 9/11 and the Security State
  • Chapter 2. 9/11 and the Right
  • Chapter 3. Liberal Complicity in the War on Terror
  • Chapter 4. Obama and the "Sustainable" War on Terror
  • Chapter 5. The Right vs. Obama's War on Terror
  • Chapter 6. The Left vs. Obama's War on Terror
  • Chapter 7. The Decadent Phase of the War on Terror and the Rise of Trump
  • Chapter 8. Making the War on Terror Great Again
  • Chapter 9. The Invisible Enemy
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Index
Review by Booklist Review

Attempting the near impossible, national-security correspondent Ackerman offers a book stuffed to the brim with details discussing the events leading to 9/11 and how America's response paved the way for the ascension of Donald Trump to the presidency 15 years later, while still acknowledging his project's incompleteness. The bulk of the book focuses on how the political left and right each chose to frame the War on Terror and how the Security State continues to entrench itself in daily life. This book is often a grim recitation of how facts are conflated with political maneuvers, like equating Saddam Hussein with al-Qaeda and then-President Bush asserting that Iraq held weapons of mass destruction. But Democrats Clinton, Kerry, and Biden also acquiesced to the war that followed. CIA machinations thread through every chapter, especially when the wrong people are spied on for the wrong reasons. The book gives readers a deeper-than-headlines take on Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, and Julian Assange. Ackerman asserts that Trump used the War on Terror as an "instrument of his will." This book does a masterful job communicating how nothing is as it seems. As for what to make of that assertion, the onus is on the reader.

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Bigotry, loss of freedom, government overreach, and Donald Trump's presidency are the fruits of the endless "war on terror," according to this sweeping indictment of post-9/11 politics. Journalist Ackerman's debut rehashes 20 years of disastrous, abusive policies following the September 11 attacks, including wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the CIA's torture of terrorism suspects, President Obama's drone strikes and their civilian casualties, and the NSA's warrantless surveillance programs. More deeply, he contends, the demonization of imagined Muslim enemies fueled currents of anti-immigrant nativism and white supremacism that culminated in Trump's MAGA movement. Ackerman's critique of specific elements of the war on terror are incisive, if sometimes lurid--"Coked-up naked gym rats on heavy steroidal doses would run onto Green Zone balconies and, screaming, fire AK-47 rounds into the Iraqi night sky," he writes, describing American military contractors in Baghdad--and spares neither Republicans nor Democrats. Unfortunately, his promiscuous applications of the trope ("Coronavirus was the public health equivalent of the War on Terror") and blanket allegations of racism ("only white supremacy can truly explain the depth of right-wing fury at Obama") lack nuance. By explaining everything in terms of counterterrorism and white supremacism, Ackerman ends up obscuring more than he clarifies. Agent: Laurie Liss, Sterling Lord Literistic. (Aug.)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

National-security reporter Ackerman delivers a tour-de-force about the transformation of the United States in the two decades since the September 11 attacks, that thoroughly and comprehensively examines how the post-9/11 security state has engulfed society. Measures that are supposed to give a feeling of security have instead created an unnerving apparatus that destabilizes societal norms, Ackerman contends, pointing to a few key moments in early 21st-century history, including the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the Iraq War (2003--11), and the killing of Osama Bin Laden in 2011. What Ackerman does best is explaining how political discourse fed into keeping the security state colossally unchecked, with no defined end point. Both liberals and conservatives receive blame here, especially in Ackerman's discussion of the war on terror. He concludes that the monstrous security state has turned in on itself with the rise of nativist violence, militarized policing, and fractured governance. VERDICT An essential work that encapsulates the trajectory of American politics in the first two decades of the 21st century, and the lasting impact on everyday life.--Jacob Sherman, Univ. of Texas, San Antonio

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

How Osama bin Laden helped bring about not just 9/11, but also the events of Jan. 6, 2021. Donald Trump, writes Daily Beast senior national security correspondent Ackerman, "understood something about the War on Terror that [others] did not"--namely, that underlying it was the view that the enemy comprised non-White groups and nations "from a hostile foreign civilization." Read: Islam. Certainly, that's how many Muslims read it, and though Trump decried America's foreign wars, he did little to rein in the hyperactive military. Anti-Muslim sentiment long predated 9/11, but when the towers fell, the resulting "Forever War," its targets almost exclusively Muslim, backfired. It was ill defined and essentially unwinnable, "intolerable for a people accustomed to thinking of itself as exceptional." While that war was fought abroad, it reverberated powerfully at home, where a surveillance state developed that had unprecedented police powers and "an atmosphere of paranoia that frequently turned conspiratorial." As Ackerman rightly points out, the paranoia was directed toward Muslims but also toward liberals who were presumed to coddle the enemy. It was pointedly not directed at the domestic right-wing terrorists who have worked just as much mischief as al-Qaida. Immediately after the tragedies at Ruby Ridge and Waco, the National Rifle Association's Wayne LaPierre denounced federal agents in their "stormtrooper uniforms" as enemies of "law-abiding citizens," a view very much in evidence today. Meanwhile, hate crimes against Muslims have steadily risen, fueled by nativism, evangelical zealotry, and racism, all of which congealed in the cynical MAGA movement, which brought the world the spectacle of the right-wing extremist invasion of the Capitol and ongoing attempts to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election--even as the Trump administration branded peaceful protestors as insurrectionists. Ackerman capably connects seemingly disparate elements without forcing issues so that readers will see how such matters as the Branch Davidian siege of 1993 helped fuel White supremacist movements today. An intelligent, persuasive book about events that are all too current. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Prologue The Worst Terrorist Attack in American History The city of God lay deep in the Ozark hills of northeastern Oklahoma, at the end of six miles of dirt road. Young men in thrown-together fatigues guarded the gates to the domed church of Elohim City. The church was the center of community life for the isolated settlement, host to charismatic morning prayers and evening assemblies. It flew Christian banners and Confederate flags. Many of Elohim City's roughly one hundred residents were transients, who drove their mobile homes onto its four hundred acres for as long as they needed refuge from an iniquitous world. Polygamy was encouraged and patriarchy enforced. Nondomestic work for women was forbidden. "Elohim" is a Hebrew word for God, but those who lived in Elohim City preferred to call God "Yahuah," owing to something a resident once uttered while speaking in tongues. They considered themselves the real Israelites, not those descendants of the devil who called themselves Jews. That was what Christian Identity, the religion practiced at Elohim City, instructed. No one at the compound ate pork, and children at its school learned Hebrew. Knowledge of Hebrew was valuable for demonstrating that the different words for "man" in the Bible proved that Yahuah created races of people, some superior, others inferior. Their faith ordained that the chosen people-descended from the northern European countries that these true Israelites settled-separate themselves in preparation for the reckoning to come. A monstrosity called the Zionist Occupational Government (ZOG), a cabal of Jews, had subverted America, the intended home of the chosen, and empowered their subhuman puppets. A local boy sang visitors a song about murdering Barney the dinosaur. Underneath his costume, the boy explained, Barney was a "nigger." The patriarch of Elohim City was an elderly Canadian named Robert G. Millar. Millar said that a vision from Yahuah had led him on the path to both America and Christian Identity. A polygamist known to his followers as Grandpa, Millar had founded Elohim City in 1973, and about half its populace at any given time were members of his extended family. "Any equality at all" among races was "against the Bible," Millar explained to a Dateline NBC reporter. Yet he refused to label himself a white supremacist: "Let's put, 'We're separatists.'" Asked to account for his racism, Millar replied, "The truth is often offensive." When he died in 2001, the Southern Poverty Law Center ranked Millar among a generation of men "who have led the American radical right for some 30 years." Christian Identity did not accept the Rapture foretold in Revelation. The Second Coming would instead result from struggle-an armed struggle to racially cleanse the world, probably after an economic collapse that would bring down this mongrel civilization. The heavily armed residents of Elohim City meant to triumph in the rough life to come. Under the tutelage of a German Army veteran named Andreas Strassmeir, they drilled in marksmanship and repurposed old ammunition crates into building materials. That established the community as a safe haven not only for Christian Identity believers but for fellow-traveling neo-Nazis, as well as violent criminals. These included members of a gang called the Aryan Republican Army, which aimed to finance the white revolution by robbing banks across the Midwest while wearing Point Break-inspired masks of ex-presidents. Another was the leader of a white supremacist militia, the Covenant, Sword and Arm of the Lord (CSA), which had forced law enforcement into a three-day standoff in Arkansas in 1985. Two years earlier a CSA member had plotted an attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. According to an informant for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, present at Elohim City in July 1994 was a wiry former soldier, firearms enthusiast, and white revolutionary named Timothy McVeigh. An infantryman from Buffalo, McVeigh had already begun preparing for the revolution by the time he enlisted in the army in 1988. He called Black soldiers by slurs, perceived their insolence everywhere, and seethed that the army was too politically correct to discipline them. At the same time, McVeigh flagrantly violated army regulations by smuggling at least twenty guns into his Fort Riley barracks. Guns were the nonbelieving McVeigh's religion. He spent his spare time at gun shows, which were not only a means to amass his arsenal but a way to make money. At the gun shows, McVeigh sold copies of a white-supremacist propaganda novel called The Turner Diaries, the story of a gun confiscation by the government's Black enforcers and Jewish puppeteers that prompts a white militant vanguard to begin a firestorm to purify America. Service in the initial 1991 ground invasion of Iraq-where he earned a Bronze Star and even a Combat Infantryman Badge-taught McVeigh that the corrupted government would rather use the army to enforce the globalist agenda of the United Nations than to protect America's borders from invasion. While in uniform, McVeigh sent the Ku Klux Klan twenty dollars for a trial membership and a white power T-shirt. His army evaluations described him as an "inspiration" to younger soldiers. McVeigh left the army in 1992, a time when he thought the United States was sending signals of an intensifying persecution of whites. In August the ZOG's ATF and FBI goon squads shot it out at Ruby Ridge, in the northern Idaho mountains, with the white patriot and ex-Green Beret Randy Weaver, leaving his wife and fourteen-year-old son dead, as well as a U.S. marshal. Not long afterward the new president, Bill Clinton, introduced a regime of background checks for gun purchasers and then a ban on semiautomatic rifles and other weapons of the sort McVeigh stockpiled. Barely six months after Ruby Ridge, the FBI and ATF besieged an armed religious compound in Waco, Texas, for fifty-one days before a fire consumed seventy-six Branch Davidians inside. April 19, 1993, became a martyrs' day for those dedicated to resisting ZOG tyranny. McVeigh, working as a security guard in Buffalo, told a colleague that he had driven to Texas to support the doomed Branch Davidians. He was openly talking about avenging them. Along with his army buddy and lackey Terry Nichols, McVeigh constructed a plan strikingly similar to the CSA's 1983 plot to hit ZOG in its Oklahoma City redoubt. By purchasing massive amounts of ammonium nitrite, McVeigh could create a forty-eight-hundred-pound bomb. He and Nichols would steal blasting caps from a construction site, rent a Ryder truck, assemble the bomb, and drive it to the Murrah building for detonation. The historian Kathleen Belew, in her book Bring the War Home, observed that McVeigh's plan followed "a very specific example of a truck bombing" from The Turner Diaries. To prevent any confusion about why the attack was perpetrated, McVeigh chose April 19 as his day of reckoning. With another army friend, Mike Fortier, McVeigh performed reconnaissance on the Murrah building in December 1994. He would later claim that the evening darkness prevented him from seeing that the building housed a day care center on its second floor. McVeigh didn't plan to die in the bombing. Two weeks before the attack McVeigh placed a phone call to Elohim City. A biography with which he cooperated stated that he was trying to determine if Millar's compound would give him shelter. His other option was another white-supremacist training camp, this one belonging to the National Alliance, the party founded by Turner Diaries author William Pierce. He was unable to reach either of them. But what happened to him he considered less important than his ability to inspire the revolution that would follow. He left in his car propaganda extolling "the motto of many American militias . . . 'Don't tread on me.'" It was 9:02 on a clear Tuesday morning when the bomb sheared the facade off the Murrah building. While the blast killed some instantly, many more were crushed and buried alive. Twenty-year-old Daina Bradley was running an errand at the Social Security office when the ground floor caved in. Rubble pinned her arm and her leg as frigid water pooled beneath her. For hours she stared up at a concrete slab whose fall had stopped just short of crushing her skull. Rescue workers who found her had to amputate her leg to extract her before the rubble shifted and killed them all. Bradley's three-year-old daughter, Peachlyn, her four-month-old son, Gabreon, and her forty-four-year-old mother, Cheryl Bradley Hammons, were among the 168 people McVeigh killed. Nineteen of the victims were children. It was, at the time, the worst terrorist attack in American history. Journalists and their law-enforcement sources immediately knew the culprits of the Murrah bombing: Muslims. Only two years had passed since Ramzi Yousef set off an explosive at the World Trade Center; Oklahoma City must have been a follow-on attack. CNN reported, then retracted, that Middle Easterners were under immediate law-enforcement suspicion. A respectable-sounding conspiracist who saw American Islam through the lens of foreign subversion, Steven Emerson, told CBS that Oklahoma City was "probably considered one of the largest centers of Islamic radical activity outside the Middle East," an assessment never to reappear. Former representative Dave McCurdy, an Oklahoma Democrat who had recently chaired the House intelligence committee, stated that there was "very clear evidence" that "fundamentalist Islamic terrorist groups" were involved. With culpability established, commentary turned to what action needed to be taken. In the New York tabloid Newsday, columnist Jeff Kamen typified the public appetite for a response to jihadists. Foreign students, diplomats, and other "threatening people," he declared, ought to be placed under surveillance, with Navy SEALs and other elite military units dealing with those revealed to be dangerous. "Shoot them now," Kamen wrote, "before they get us." Mike Royko, a titan of Chicago journalism, wrote in the Tribune that the country was in denial about the "act of war" launched against it. Treating the bombing as merely a crime would only encourage further attacks. "Because we are so open a society, terrorists can be sent here almost as easily as shipping a package," lamented Royko, who called on the government to "stop admitting people who come from countries that are hostile." Right-wing radio host Cal Thomas agreed that the danger from Muslims proved the larger point that "illegal immigrants are a threat to our democracy." The presumption of Muslim guilt had consequences. Ibrahim Abdullah Hassan Ahmed, an Oklahoma City man born in Palestine, attempted to fly to Jordan and was questioned by police at his connection in Chicago. When he had to rebook after missing his flight, officials intercepted him in London and sent him back to Oklahoma City. False reports circulated that he had bomb-making equipment in his luggage; the FBI insisted he was never a suspect. Ahmed, the Los Angeles Times explained, "had too many similarities to the sort of person the police thought they were seeking." In the wake of Oklahoma City, law enforcement nationwide received 227 reports of harassment against Muslims, The Christian Science Monitor reported, ranging from "verbal threats to assaults." Fear gripped Muslim communities far from Oklahoma City. A restaurant owner in Orlando told the paper, "We all phoned each other for support. I'll never forget it." Several Elohim City residents, including security chief Andreas Strassmeir, whose card McVeigh carried in his wallet, reportedly decamped from the compound ahead of April 19. Grandpa Millar was in Arkansas to witness the execution of the CSA militiaman who plotted the original attack on Oklahoma City. If they feared arrest, it never came. The need for a successful prosecution after the Murrah bombing-as well as a strong FBI/ATF desire to avoid another Waco-ultimately drove a narrow investigative focus onto McVeigh and Nichols. An ATF informant, Carol Howe, told a grand jury that Strassmeir discussed taking "direct action" against the government in Oklahoma City. But investigators were unable to substantiate her tip that the compound possessed an illegal M60 machine gun, which was the likeliest way to charge Strassmeir with a crime. McVeigh, to the frustration of his attorneys, insisted that he acted alone, and his plan to decamp to Elohim City was the limit of the community's involvement in the plot. The compound faced little post-Oklahoma City scrutiny beyond the occasional visit from journalists and academics. Whatever his views on the tyranny of ZOG's police, Millar liked to tell reporters about the warm relationship Elohim City had with the local sheriff. Whether or not anyone at Elohim City had specific foreknowledge of McVeigh's plot-a supposition that remains unsubstantiated twenty-five years later-the compound was part of the broad infrastructure of militant white supremacy in late-twentieth-century America. Belew writes that Oklahoma City was "the culmination of decades of white-power organizing." Along with the CSA's Arkansas base, the Aryan Nations' Idaho headquarters, Jack Oliphant's Hephzibeh Ranch in Arizona, and other white supremacist warrens, Elohim City provided a haven, ideological and spiritual strengthening, connections to people and groups with proven track records of violence, and access to a bounty of weapons. The infrastructure was loose by design, rather than organized into a coherent network. That suited people and groups who preferred living in the rugged country, as far as possible from the reach of the government. It also reflected the influence of Louis Beam. Beam, an influential KKK grand dragon from Texas, put forward in the 1980s a theory of "leaderless resistance." It envisioned "survival" camps for militants where autonomous patriots could prepare for the coming guerrilla war against a government that had turned hostile to white interests during the 1960s. Its goal was the reconquest of America. Until victory came, these compounds would be microcosms of the "Racial Nation of and by ourselves" they sought to establish. Beam drew on his Vietnam service not only for militancy and authority but to construct what Belew calls a narrative of "stymied grief, constant danger, fixation on weapons and betrayal" by elites whose horrific war had become a "catalyst for American decline." Remaining leaderless was both a tactical necessity and a key component of their political strategy. It would allow for a broad disavowal of any individual act of violence, particularly from their politicians, whose objective was to enter "mainstream 'kosher' associations that are generally seen as harmless." Accordingly, even after McVeigh's conviction, Grandpa Millar "conjecture[d]" to a reporter that the bombing was a government attempt "to frame Christian Identity." But even if the white supremacists' connection with McVeigh was more ideological than operational, the public discussion of Oklahoma City obscured any association between them. As with Ruby Ridge, the press reported McVeigh's "survivalism" as his most salient feature, and his motivations "anti-government." Both characterizations made McVeigh's mission seem politically agnostic. You didn't have to be a white supremacist to consider the government tyrannical-you didn't even have to be right wing. A poll taken barely a week after the bombing found that 45 percent of respondents believed the government was a "threat to the constitutional rights enjoyed by the average American." Survivalism sounded defensive in nature. Journalists typically waited until the later paragraphs of their articles to identify McVeigh as a white supremacist, if they did at all. The Baltimore Sun asked if the "American love affair with the strong silent type" like the "loner" McVeigh would come to an end. A Washington Post profile portrayed the twenty-seven-year-old McVeigh as an "Ordinary Boy" who had "lived the divorce revolution" and turned to guns to fill the void left by his absent mother. Excerpted from Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump by Spencer Ackerman All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.