America second How America's elites are making China stronger

Isaac Stone Fish

Book - 2022

"A timely, provocative expose of our political and business leadership's deep ties to China: a network of people who believe they are doing the right thing-at a great often hidden cost to our society"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

327.73051/Stone Fish
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 327.73051/Stone Fish Checked In
Subjects
Published
New York : Alfred A. Knopf 2022.
Language
English
Main Author
Isaac Stone Fish (author)
Edition
First Edition
Physical Description
276 pages ; 24 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780525657705
9781984898937
  • Introduction
  • Part 1. How to Win Friends and Influence People
  • Chapter 1. The History of America's Influence on China
  • Chapter 2. Friends with Benefits
  • Chapter 3. America Consents
  • Part 2. Friends in High Places
  • Chapter 4. Shangri-La
  • Chapter 5. Hollywood Learns to Please Beijing
  • Chapter 6. Universities and Self-Censorship
  • Part 3. With Friends Like These ...
  • Chapter 7. Friendship and Its Discontents
  • Chapter 8. Defending the Rights of Chinese and Chinese Americans
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Index
Review by Booklist Review

Fish admits to having bent to the will of the ruling Communist Party when he lived in China (2006--2011), while also building a resumé that now enables him to advise Americans on the political perils of any business dealings with the regime. It's complicated, yet Fish, who writes on China for the Washington Post, Slate, and Foreign Affairs, lays out a damning narrative of how American corporations, sports leagues, universities, media, politicians, and diplomats, among others--citing names and incidents--have kowtowed to the Communist Party to protect their own interests while vainly, perhaps cynically, expressing the hope that, in the process, China might somehow democratize. In contrast to Russia's efforts to sow discord among Americans, Fish says that China's efforts to dominate the U.S. by cajoling, cudgeling, dodging, and, finally, dangling a tantalizingly massive consumer market are far more artful. China wants you to "do what it wants without being told," a Singaporean diplomat observes. Fish ends with a strong pushback against the demonization of Chinese Americans, and of mainland Chinese; his beef here is always with the Communist Party.

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

The lures of money and access have turned U.S. political and business leaders into covert supporters of Chinese interests, according to this stinging exposé. Fish, a Washington Post columnist and business consultant, cites examples of prominent, politically well-connected Americans accepting speaking engagements, board seats, and, in presidential brother Neil Bush's case, prostitutes, from institutions tied to the Chinese Communist Party in exchange for supporting the Party's stances on Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang concentration camps, and other controversial issues. (Fish labels Henry Kissinger a principal "agent of Chinese influence" for his ubiquitous role advising supplicants on how to kowtow to Beijing.) The rot extends, Fish argues, to American corporations that lobby Congress for pro-Chinese trade policies in exchange for access to Chinese markets; Hollywood studios that rewrite scripts at the behest of Chinese officials to emphasize China's wholesomeness and heroism so they can get their films screened there; and American universities with lucrative branches in and partnerships with China that tolerate censorship of students, faculty, and speakers. Written in tart prose that pulls no punches, Fish's persuasive investigation reveals a morass of corruption and sycophancy that has worrisome geopolitical implications. Readers will be alarmed. (Feb.)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Library Journal Review

Formerly a Beijing correspondent for Newsweek and now founder and CEO of the research firm Strategy Risks, which provides risk assessment relevant to relations between corporations and the Chinese Communist Party, Fish here digs deeply into the ties between China and U.S. political and business leadership. His argument: these leaders applauded when China expanded into the global market, seeing it as a democratizing force within that country, then became so entrenched in that belief--and in the connections they have built in China--that they have not stood up to China on key political, social, and human rights issues. That may now be changing.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

Stone Fish delivers a scorching denunciation of U.S. leaders who serve Chinese interests. As the author, who lived in China for six years while writing for Newsweek, notes, Henny Kissinger's principal activities over the last 40 years have centered on representing the Chinese government's interests in the West: "The most accurate way to describe Kissinger…is as an agent of Chinese influence." Kissinger does this in various ways, such as serving on the international advisory council of the China Development Bank. But the Chinese Communist Party calls on him more as a go-to fix-it guy. For example, following American efforts to force China into accepting Taiwan as an independent state, Kissinger called on Washington to ask them "to move in the direction of improving relations with China." However, Kissinger is not alone in the corps of "diplomat consultants" who have earned lucrative contracts by arguing for such improved relations, which, the author notes, also serves them well in China in helping open doors to American companies there, allowing these consultants to play on a two-way street. One sector that did not do well, historically, was Hollywood, which earned low box-office numbers in China for years after daring to release two films about the Dalai Lama, Kundun and Seven Years in Tibet. As a result, Disney in particular suffered, but they sent Kissinger, hat in hand, to beg pardon, opening the way to a Disneyland in Hong Kong and the Chinese government's allowing 20 foreign films into the country instead of the previous 10. In 1998, China produced only as much revenue for Disney as Peru, "and yet Disney still capitulated. It knew which way the winds were blowing." Whether in academia or business, China has exerted so much influence, Stone Fish concludes, that American elites exercise strict self-censorship when it comes to criticizing China--a dictator's dream, if an exercise in self-serving cowardice. An eye-opening look at the behind-the-scenes sway China holds over so much of the U.S. economy. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

CHAPTER ONE The History of America's Influence on China ★ Although America only recently started grappling with Beijing's influence, China's worry about American influence stretches back to the mid-­nineteenth century, when the country entered a period of decline and decay that didn't end until the 1990s. It was a new direction for a proud and often isolated civilization. Before the mid-­nineteenth century, China had largely ignored America. Chinese elites believed that foreign countries were necessarily inferior to China--­literally the Middle, or Central, Kingdom. "The location of the United States is in the Far West," wrote the diplomat Qiying to the emperor in 1844."It is the most uncivilized and remote of all countries . . . an isolated place outside the pale, solitary and ignorant. Not only are the people entirely unversed in the forms of edicts and laws, but if the meaning be rather deep, they would probably not even be able to comprehend. It would seem that we must make our words somewhat simple." This diplomat's views of China's superiority were not that uncommon. After all, Christopher Columbus sailed to the New World in 1492 to find a shorter route to the fabled riches of the Far East, and London sent colonists to Jamestown in the early seventeenth century in part to find a route linking the Atlantic to the riches of the Pacific. To these early European explorers and colonialists, the Americas were a waypoint. As a European civilization took root in the United States, the European image of China as an exemplar of refinement and progress re­mained. The pamphleteer Thomas Paine called the Chinese "people of mild manner and good morals," Thomas Jefferson flirted with the idea of imitating China and remaining isolated from Europe, and Benjamin Franklin described China as the "wisest of nations," and even once argued that the Chinese, and not the Europeans, served as a better model for America. George Washington owned hundreds of luxury Chinese products, including a fine collection of porcelain, while the tea dumped into the harbor during the Boston Tea Party all came from China. Many Americans saw China as a "storied source of wealth and wisdom, and a country from whom the young republic might learn," the historian Gordon H. Chang writes in his book Fateful Ties: A History of America's Preoccupation with China. Until the mid-­nineteenth century China was the world's richest nation and the tea merchant Wu Bingjian, who invested in railroad construction in the United States, probably the world's richest man. Several major factors changed that dynamic and, with it, the image of China in America. Before the industrial age, the size of a country's economy basically reflected the size of its population; so China was seen as wealthy, even if millions of Chinese lived in serf-­like conditions and regularly faced famines. "China has been long one of the richest, that is, one of the most fertile, best cultivated, most industrious, and most populous countries in the world," the Scottish economist Adam Smith wrote in The Wealth of Nations, but "the poverty of the lower ranks of people in China far surpasses that of the most beggarly nations of Europe"--­a characterization that remained accurate until the 1990s. Throughout the nineteenth century, America followed the European path and industrialized and urbanized, while China remained deeply agrarian. Corruption and widespread opium addiction weakened both the country and the Qing dynasty, which had ruled China since 1644. The philosophy of Manifest Destiny and America's westward expansion, and America's massive economic growth in the mid-­nineteenth century, ended the period in which China served as a moral inspiration for some Americans. Perhaps the best description of the mid-­century shifting of power and perceptions between the two nations came from Commodore Matthew Perry, who in 1853 famously "opened up" Japan to the world by sailing a threatening squadron of ships into Tokyo's harbor.4 "With our territory spreading from ocean to ocean, and placed midway between Europe and Asia," Perry wrote in a book about his trip, published in 1856, eight years after the discovery of gold and six years after California obtained statehood, "it seemed that we might with propriety apply to ourselves the name by which China has loved to designate herself, and deem that we were, in truth, 'the Middle Kingdom.'  As power shifted from China to the United States, so too did the direction of anxiety. In the eighteenth century, some elite American observers fretted whether their remote outpost could ever aspire to the greatness of China. But in the second half of the nineteenth century it was the turn of the Chinese to look to Americans and wonder about their future. Much of these Chinese anxieties concerned Christianity: thousands of American missionaries, influenced by a millenarian strand of Christianity that believed the second coming of Jesus Christ required global conversion, saw China as the key to fulfilling the "manifest destiny of the Christian Republic," in the words of one missionary. "Look where we may, beneath the wide ex­panse of the heavens, we can find no distinct enterprise so laudable, so imperious, so inconceivable in its results, as the conversion of China," wrote another. More so than merchants and the military, missionaries shaped the country's nineteenth century. Christianity's biggest influence on China was, in a word, disastrous. Inspired by missionary texts translated into Chinese, the failed Confucian scholar Hong Xiuquan believed he was the brother of Jesus Christ. And so he wandered the countryside in the 1840s, preaching about the one true god Ye-­huo-­hua, baptizing converts, and raising an army of the faithful. Wielding his "sword for exterminating demons," Hong and his army captured the city of Nanjing and established New Jerusalem, the de facto capital of their Kingdom of Taiping, or Heavenly Peace, governed by a prime minister who called himself the Holy Ghost. In the roughly two decades it took the Qing to destroy the movement, the fighting led to the death of more than twenty million people from violence or famine--­one of the most devastating rebellions the world has ever seen. Hong died of illness or suicide in 1864 in New Jerusalem, after exhorting his faithful to follow the book of Exodus and, like the Israelis in the desert, eat manna to stay alive. Besides raising an army to fight the Taiping, the Qing waged a propaganda battle to stop the spread of Christian ideas. "A Record of Truth to Ward Off the Cult," published in 1861 under the name "the Most Heartbroken Man in the World," is an astonishing invective, more graphic than the notorious 1903 Russian anti-­Semitic text The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which concocted a Jewish plot for global domination. Probably written by a Qing general, the text warns of a dangerous religion where men marry their daughters, "practice sodomy with the priests without restraint," and seek to obtain the organs of children. American missionaries in China remained divided on whether Hong was a Christian or a blasphemer. But besides the astonishing impact of the Taiping rebellion, Christianity suffered a vanishingly low rate of actual converts. ("What infatuation to embrace such a religion as this!" the "Record of Truth" exhorts.) And so late in the nineteenth century, a group of American and British Protestant missionaries tried a new tact, packaging Christianity "together with Western education, science, capitalism, and political theory, offering the combination as a remedy that would strengthen China," writes the journalist John Pomfret in his 2016 book, The Beautiful Country and the Middle Kingdom: America and China, 1776 to the Present. "With their Chinese partners, they built China's modern education system, introduced Western medicine, print media, science, and sports, fought foot-­binding and female infanticide, organized antipoverty and rural reconstruction efforts, and nurtured generations of Chinese modernizers," Pomfret writes. This new approach was more effective than sheer proselytizing, but it engendered another round of backlash. Incited by their resentment of Christian and foreign influence and supported by the Qing, in 1898 a secret sect by the name of the Society of Righteousness and Harmony (called the Boxers, in English) started attacking foreigners throughout the country. In a move that embarrassed many local reformers, in June 1900 the de facto ruler of China, the empress dowager Cixi, declared war on the foreigners. They "blaspheme our gods," she wrote in her war declaration."Thus it is that the brave followers of the Boxers have been burning churches and killing Christians." The foreigners fought back against the Boxers and the Qing dynasty, forming a partnership called the Eight-­Nation Alliance--­the only time in history that Russia, Japan, the United States, and Germany all fought on the same side. The New York Sun called the Boxer Rebellion "the most exciting episode known to civilization." The Boxer Rebellion worsened relations between China and the West. After the Eight-­Nation Alliance defeated the Boxers and the Qing army in August 1900, some of the victorious soldiers rampaged across Beijing, looting, raping, and burning. "A great spirit of fear still holds this vast city of ruins," wrote the British journalist George Lynch, who visited Beijing after the foreign powers won. "There are the things that I must not write, and that may not be printed in England, which would seem to show that this Western civilization of ours is merely a veneer over savagery." The victors demanded an indemnity over four decades of 450 million taels of silver--­an imperial Chinese currency--­and the government ended up paying the equivalent of billions of dollars over that period, further impoverishing a country where millions lived on the cusp of starvation. The crushing defeat of the Boxers and the Qing was sobering. The Boxers had "dreamed of creating a China cleansed of the injustice of foreign ways, and they set out to free their region and their country from its humiliation by blood and fire," writes the historian Odd Arne Westad. They hastened the collapse of the Qing Empire--­a dynasty often considered foreign by many Chinese, because the rulers were of the Manchu ethnicity--­but did nothing else to purge China from outside influence. There were a few constructive aftereffects of the calamity. Part of the Boxer indemnity went back to China in the form of scholarships and the building of Tsinghua University in Beijing. Like Harvard for American politicians, Tsinghua later became the school for Communist Party elite; the Chinese chairman Hu Jintao graduated in 1965 with a degree in engineering, while his successor, Xi, received both a bachelor's in chemical engineering and a graduate degree in Marxist theory and ideological education. But generally speaking, the rebellion failed miserably. It humiliated the Qing government and became an odious reminder for the Chinese about the modern weakness and irrelevance of their country. "More fully than any event before it, the Boxer War had placed China outside the Western-­led international system, a pariah state, the center of a 1900 axis of evil," Westad writes. A decade later, in 1911, the Qing fell ushering in another period of chaos, where China was a failed state. Beijing today calls the period from the first Opium War in 1839, when the United Kingdom prevented China from limiting its imports of the drug, to the 1949 establishment of the People's Republic of China the century of humiliation. It was this miasma of weakness that "produced" Mao Zedong, the leader who reunified the country in the 1950s and returned it to its earlier state of isolation. That period between the fall of the Qing dynasty and the rise of Mao was the zenith of American influence within China, as well as Chinese esteem for America. It was a time of political unrest but extraordinary intellectual ferment. In 1919, a twenty-­five-­year-­old Mao decried the "total emptiness and rottenness of the mental universe of the entire Chinese people." Some Chinese intellectuals believed that American-­style democracy was the key to save China from its troubled interregnum. "We must sweep away millennia of despotism in all its forms," wrote Zou Rong, a revolutionary who died in prison in 1905, in a popular text, so "the descendants of the Yellow Empire all become Washingtons." Perhaps unsurprisingly, many Americans agreed. Unlike the governments in Germany, Britain, and Japan, which saw China's chaos as an opportunity to increase their colonial holdings, some U.S. government officials supported the Chinese people's struggle for democracy and regrowth. "Never has one nation had a greater opportunity to act as counsellor and friend to another and to help a vast and lovable people to realize its striving for a better life," Paul Reinsch, minister, or ambassador, to China from 1913 to 1919, wrote in his memoirs. The historian Chang explains, "It was America's fate, many believed, to be China's friend, protector, benefactor, and savior." Excerpted from America Second: How America's Elites Are Making China Stronger by Isaac Stone Fish All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.