Rhyme's rooms The architecture of poetry

Brad Leithauser

Book - 2022

"From the widely acclaimed poet, novelist, critic, and scholar, a lucid and edifying exploration of the building blocks of poetry and how they've been used over the centuries to assemble the most imperishable poems. We treasure our greatest poetry, Brad Leithauser reminds us in these pages, "not for its what but its how." In chapters on everything from iambic pentameter to how stanzas are put together to "rhyme and the way we really talk," Leithauser takes a deep dive into that how-the very architecture of poetry. He explains how meter and rhyme work in fruitful opposition ("Meter is prospective; rhyme is retrospective"), how the weirdnesses of spelling in English are a boon to the poet; why an off rh...yme will often succeed where a perfect rhyme would not; why Shakespeare and Frost can sound so similar, despite the centuries separating them. And Leithauser is just as likely to invoke Cole Porter, Stephen Sondheim, or Boz Scaggs as he is Chaucer or Milton, Bishop or Swenson, providing enlightening play-by-plays of their memorable lines. Here is both an indispensable learning tool and a delightful journey into the art of the poem--a chance for new poets and readers of poetry to grasp the fundamentals, and for experienced poets and readers to rediscover excellent works in all their fascinating detail"--

Saved in:

2nd Floor Show me where

808.1/Leithauser
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 808.1/Leithauser Checked In
Subjects
Genres
Literary criticism
Published
New York : Alfred A. Knopf 2022.
Language
English
Main Author
Brad Leithauser (author)
Edition
First edition
Item Description
"This is a Borzoi book"
Physical Description
x, 350 pages ; 22 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN
9780525655053
  • Author's Note
  • Foreword: A First Step, A First Stop
  • Chapter 1. Meeting the Funesians
  • Chapter 2. The Prosodic Contract
  • Chapter 3. Poetic Architecture
  • Chapter 4. Stanzas
  • Chapter 5. Enjambment
  • Chapter 6. Defining and Refining
  • Chapter 7. The Marriage of Meter and Rhyme (I)
  • Chapter 8. Iambic Pentameter
  • Chapter 9. Iambic Tetrameter
  • Chapter 10. Rhyme and Rhyme Decay
  • Chapter 11. Spelling and the Unexpected Rhyme
  • Chapter 12. Rhyme Poverty, Rhyme Richness
  • Chapter 13. Rhymes, and How We Really Talk
  • Chapter 14. Off Rhyme: When Good Rhymes Go Bad
  • Chapter 15. Rim Rhyme
  • Chapter 16. The Marriage of Meter and Rhyme (II)
  • Chapter 17. Wordplay and Concision
  • Chapter 18. The Look of Poetry
  • Chapter 19. Song Lyrics
  • Chapter 20. Poetry and Folly
  • Chapter 21. Dining with the Funesians
  • Chapter 22. Drinking with the Funesians
  • Chapter 23. The Essential Conservatism of Poetry
  • Chapter 24. The Essential Radicalism of Poetry
  • Glossary
  • Permissions Credits
  • Acknowledgments
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Poet and novelist Leithauser (The Promise of Elsewhere) brilliantly elucidates poetry for "the reader who loves words and literature, but maybe feels some trepidation... on confronting a poem on a page." He maintains that a society's literary health can be gauged by the vigor of its poetry and those who read it, and explores the craftwork of several poets, playwrights, and songwriters. In doing so, he delineates the building blocks of poetry, such as stanzas, meter, and rhyme, along the way tracing the internal rhymes in Robert Frost's work; calling Shakespeare's blank verse "stately yet pliable, solid without being stolid"; and extolling Stephen Sondheim as "Byron's progeny." Leithauser facilitates a deep appreciation of the craft without slipping into academic jargon, and his own prose is lyrical, as when he describes a poem as "a compact sonic parade, marching clamorously through the tunnel of the ear canal, an ever-shifting zone of commotion in which the most recent sounds serially dominate." His writing is a joy to read, as is his message that poetry can benefit one's mind--the first message of all poems, he writes, is to "slow down." Readers ready to discover the power of poetry need look no further. (Feb.)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

An invitation to the "quiet discipline of poetry." Poet, teacher, and novelist Leithauser, hoping to inspire his contemporaries to read more poetry, aims his thoughtful overview of prosody at general readers who may feel trepidation when encountering a poem. Unlike scholarly books that focus mostly on what a poem says, Leithauser is equally concerned with how a poem conveys meaning: the building blocks that make for its particular architecture. For readers' edification, he appends to his analyses a glossary that defines many of the technical terms that he uses, from accentual-syllabic meter to trochee and anapest. Moreover, as examples of poetic forms and language, he includes children's verse, light verse by writers such as Ogden Nash, and songs by pop lyricists such as Irving Berlin, Lorenz Hart, Cole Porter, and Stephen Sondheim, which he thinks will resonate with a broad readership. Still, Leithauser's close readings assume a fairly sophisticated familiarity with canonical poets and poetic styles. He considers in separate chapters basic forms and attributes of poetry--stanzas, enjambment, iambic pentameter and tetrameter--and rhymes: exact, unexpected, surprising, and the variation known as "rim rhyme," "where consonants are held steady while internal vowels are shifted." That type of rhyme, he notes, "opens to the poet a playground for fresh recreation." Among a wide range of examples, Leithauser includes many of his favorite poets and specific poems. Including Conrad Aiken's "Morning Song," Robert Frost's "After Apple-Picking," and Amy Clampitt's "The Sun Underfoot Among the Sundews," these personal connections give the volume a welcome intimacy. Poetry, Leithauser advises, requires readers to slow down, preferably to read aloud, and to be open to the idea that poems "frequently urge a change of life." In contrast to W.H. Auden's declaration that poetry "makes nothing happen," Leithauser counters that poetry "insists that we read and reread and reeducate ourselves" in order to test our values and reset our moral compass. A warm, well-considered celebration of a rich literary form. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

CHAPTER ONE Meeting the Funesians Let us begin with a tribe of people residing high in the Andes Mountains, where the brisk air is thin and vistas are arrestingly clear. We'll call them the Funesians. They are a small and in many ways unexceptional community, subsist-ing mostly on boiled potatoes and pickled turnips and a mild rhubarb brandy. Days roll by, decades pass, marked chiefly by a gratified uneventfulness. The Funesians are remarkable in only one aspect, really: They are, far and away, the fin-est readers of poetry in the world. They hear things the rest of us don't hear. The question this book poses is what can you--whether you live in New York or London, in Johan-nesburg or Jakarta, in a tidal shack or a yurt or a submarine or a castle--learn from the Funesians? Plenty, I think. In their modest but dizzying excellence, the Funesians instruct and enlighten us about our limita-tions as readers and thinkers. Perhaps all art is an expression of human restlessness against our bodily confines and of our adaptations within them; perhaps every art form is an arena for measuring the mettle of our physiological and mental capabilities. Even so, poetry--like its sister arts music and architecture--is a medium that constantly brings this testing into sharp relief, with pointed and poignant models. Let's open with a valedictory poem by Dylan Thomas, "Prologue," completed in 1952, shortly before his death. Thomas himself did not suspect it, but at his close he was writing for the Funesians. "Prologue" initially appears to lack a rhyme scheme. You have to reach the poem's exact mid-point, lines 51 and 52, to meet your first rhyme, a couplet: Sheep white hollow farms To Wales in my arms From here on out, the rhymes unfold punctually, systemati-cally. The next line, line 53, turns out to rhyme with line 50, and line 54 with 49, and so forth, each later line finding its earlier, coordinated partner, until finally the second-to-last line rhymes with the poem's second line, and its final line with its first. Everything's neatly paired. "Prologue" is a wildly eccentric construction. Thomas built it mostly for himself, I suppose; poets are forever erect-ing self-imposed obstacles that the general reader is unlikely to appreciate, or perhaps even notice. For an ordinary reader, "Prologue" offers a peculiar experience. If it comes across as an unrhymed poem for most of its length, there's a fleeting middle interlude, beginning with line 52, when something else occurs: You hear the rhymes chiming away, creating an ever-dwindling music. Depending on your ear, you may hear the rhymes for four or six lines, eight, ten, maybe twelve, but no one is going to hear all fifty-one of them. No one except a Funesian. To hold inside their brains, in order, fifty-one rhymes--why, it's a piece of cake for the Funesians. Let's assume that, as a little joke, Thomas had created a random and minuscule disorder: The rhyme that was supposed to fall at line 89 (linked to line 14) actually fell at line 88. You and I would never notice. But the Funesian reader's eyebrows would lift, followed by a slight but unmis-takably quizzical shaking of the head. What is he doing? our Funesian wonders. The rhymes are out of whack. When a poem is placed before a Funesian, he or she, though human in all other tastes and talents, becomes a kind of extraterrestrial. The Funesians notice everything. Every variant of rhyme, every sonic repetition (not merely of word but of syllable and phoneme), every tiny buried euphony and dissonance, every metrical variation, every little tension and release in the rhythms, every pun, every punctuational inconsistency--there is no end to all the things they notice. For the rest of us (mere human readers), rhymes fade and are meant to fade. Evanescence is the essence of rhyme. Our ears move on. Rhymes live, in Shakespeare's phrase, within a "dying fall." For a few instants, a rhyme chimes inside the ear, recalling an earlier sound. An echo is celebrated, then discarded as another echo surfaces. In poems written for ordinary human beings, the rhymes are therefore proximate, especially with the most popular forms, like the ballad or Shakespearean sonnet or limerick. But as any handbook of poetic forms will show, this propin-quity of rhymes is true of rarefied forms as well (the villanelle, the ballade, terza rima, ottava rima, rhyme royal). Most rhyme schemes require partnered sounds to fall no more than thirty syllables apart--and usually much closer. Sounds come and go within a poem, as each line, with its unique freight of reso-nances, in effect replaces and supplants a previous line, with its own unique freight. A poem is a compact sonic parade, marching clamorously through the tunnel of the ear canal, an ever-shifting zone of commotion in which the most recent sounds serially dominate. It turns out that thirty syllables (three lines of iambic pentameter --see the glossary for words in boldface type) represent a chasm both sizable yet bridgeable. A rhyme spaced at an interval of thirty syllables speaks of resuscitation, of a spirited and robust call-and-response across that black and echoless abyss that threatens every poem. Having composed poetry for more than a millennium, experimenting all the while with echoes and durations, English-language poets have learned that readers can be trusted to hear rhymes across this distance. Among popular poetic structures, the Miltonic son-net maintains the longest interval between rhymes. It's an inflexible form in its octave, or first eight lines (they rhyme ABBAABBA ), though highly flexible in its sestet, or final six lines, which allow rhymes to fall where they may, provided no lines remain unrhymed. These rhymes can therefore achieve a gap as long as fifty syllables, the distance between the end words to lines 9 and 14. Beyond fifty syllables, the distance evidently becomes too great. The web strand linking any two words grows increas-ingly attenuated, then breaks. Of course, poets live to chal-lenge accepted limitations, and they will often (in their spidery ingenuity) contrive to stretch a rhyme as far as it will go. This is what's happening at the conclusion of Robert Frost's "After Apple-Picking." (Speaking of spiders, Frost created one of the most memorable web weavers in world lit-erature with his sonnet "Design," to which we'll turn in the next chapter.) "After Apple-Picking" is a poem of forty-two rhymed lines that follow no established scheme. At the start, the rhymes are unavoidably clangorous: My long two-pointed ladder's sticking through a tree Toward heaven still, And there's a barrel that I didn't fill Beside it, and there may be two or three Apples I didn't pick upon some bough. But I am done with apple-picking now. But the rhymes grow quieter at the close, as the exhausted speaker/farmer, his harvesting duties accomplished, begins to drift off. And it's surely no accident that the longest wait for a rhyme consummates with the poem's last word, a full seven lines removed from its mate. The poet, like the farmer he's depicting, can now say, All done at last, as the concluding rhyme drops with an almost subliminal echo into the drows-ing mind: For all That struck the earth, No matter if not bruised or spiked with stubble, Went surely to the cider-apple heap As of no worth. One can see what will trouble This sleep of mine, whatever sleep it is. Were he not gone, The woodchuck could say whether it's like his Long sleep, as I describe its coming on, Or just some human sleep. Frost has kept the final rhyme alive partly through internal rhyme, thrice slipping sleep into these eleven lines before it materializes as the final rhyme word. Even so, the last rhyme is, appropriately, the softest and sleepiest in the poem. And-- perhaps no coincidence--it arrives fifty syllables after its part-ner (fifty-one, actually); in roundabout fashion we've arrived at a familiar threshold. Fifty syllables. It's a sizable distance--the extent of three haikus, and longer than some immortal whole English- language poems (Frost's "Hannibal," A. E. Housman's "Here Dead Lie We," Robert Herrick's "The Coming of Good Luck"). Much can be uttered in fifty syllables--asserted, questioned, contradicted, resolved. But while the reader is following these assertions, questions, contradictions, resolu-tions, she is also holding aloft a sound in her head, waiting for it to encounter its soul mate, and waiting for the two united sounds, now bound in wedlock, to be put to bed. Any good reader of poetry is a born multitasker. Excerpted from Rhyme's Rooms: The Architecture of Poetry by Brad Leithauser All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.