I, human AI, automation, and the quest to reclaim what makes us unique

Chamorro-Premuzic (business psychology, Univ. College, London) depicts a parasitic relationship between humans and artificial intelligence in his latest book describing how artificial intelligence feeds--and in turn feeds upon--users' narcissism and bias. Technology is neither neutral nor free of prejudice because it is built by humans and, therefore, on human assumptions. The book focuses largely on social media algorithms rather than the latest iterations of generative artificial intelligence--ChatGPT, Bard, etc. Chapter 1, "Being in the AI Age," is a standout, providing an overview of the social media and big data "echo-system," which exploits basic human desires to ensnare users and capture and commodify their data and attention. The side effects are serious: reductions in togetherness, creativity, humility, productivity, attention, and exposure to alternative points of view. Although the title suggests a path to resistance, the advice here is sparse and generic. Instead, cynicism and shock value abound. Chamorro-Premuzic provides footnotes, but sources vary in quality, and several claims would have benefited from a citation. Darkly humorous self-checks conclude each chapter but may not resonate with college students. Summing Up: Recommended. General readers only. --Lauren deLaubell, SUNY Cortland

The threat posed by artificial intelligence isn't mass unemployment or murderous droids but subtler mental derangements, according to this astute study. Columbia psychology professor Chamorro-Premuzic (Why Do So Many Incompetent Men Become Leaders?) suggests that AI's use in search engines, social media, and gadgetry is part of an effort by tech companies to harvest attention and money by identifying and manipulating human patterns of behavior. AI, he contends, prods users to scan and click in predictable, routinized ways; saps attention and patience with information overload; reinforces biases (hiring algorithms, for instance, can recreate bosses' racial prejudices); and feeds narcissism by courting obsession over the likes garnered by selfies. Chamorro-Premuzic sees little psychic upside to AI, though he's hopeful that using better data could enable it to challenge rather than amplify biases. The author sometimes meanders away from AI, as when he offers a stimulating celebration of humility as a prerequisite for competence, and the elegant prose ensures his perceptive analysis goes down smoothly ("While we optimize our lives for AI... our very identity and existence have been collapsed to the categories machines use to understand and predict our behavior, our whole character reduced to the things AI predicts about us"). The result is a shrewd, insightful take on the dangers of AI. (Feb.)