The struggle for a decent politics : on liberal as an adjective

The struggle for a decent politics On liberal as an adjective

Michael Walzer

Book - 2023

There was a time when liberalism was an ism like any other, but that time, writes Michael Walzer, is gone. "Liberal" now conveys not a specific ideology but a moral stance, so the word is best conceived not as a noun but as an adjective--one is a "liberal democrat" or a "liberal nationalist." Walzer itemizes the characteristics described by "liberal" in an inventory of his own deepest political and moral commitments--among other things, to the principle of equality, to the rule of law, and to a pluralism that is both political and cultural. Unabashedly asserting that liberalism comprises a universal set of values ("they must be universal," he writes, "since they are under assault around... the world"), Walzer reminds us in this inspiring book why those values are worth fighting for.

Saved in:
Place a Hold Save to List Email this

2nd Floor Show me where

320.51/Walzer
1 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
2nd Floor 320.51/Walzer Checked In
Subjects
2000-2099
Liberalism > 21st century.
Liberalism.
Published
New Haven : Yale University Press 2023.
Language
English
Main Author
Michael Walzer (author)
Physical Description
xii, 161 pages ; 23 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 153-156) and index.
ISBN
9780300267235
  • Why the adjective?
  • Liberal Democrats
  • Liberal Socialists
  • Liberal Nationalists and Internationalists
  • Liberal communitarians
  • Liberal feminists
  • Liberal professors aznd intellectuals
  • Liberal Jews
  • Who is and who isn't?.
Review by Kirkus Book Review

A stirring defense of liberalism as the political stance best suited to democracy. One can be all sorts of things politically and be a liberal, according to Walzer's definition of liberalism as enfolding moral qualities: "We are, or aspire to be, open-minded, generous, and tolerant." One can be a conservative and embrace them; ditto a libertarian, although, as the author notes, "radical individualism and equality are rarely seen together in these latter days, and I am not sure they fit together in what we used to call the real world." What one cannot be is totalitarian--or racist, antisemitic, homophobic, etc. Walzer's definitions tend to be broad and encompassing. Democracy, in one formulation, has as its aim "to create a political order where the greatest number of people, when everyone is counted, actually govern the country." That is, of course, with all the checks and balances that guard against majoritarian tyranny and that preserve civil society--"where men and women choose their friends, colleagues, comrades, and fellows." A liberal can also be a socialist, so long as the socialism one espouses is not a true dictatorship of the proletariat and is arrived at democratically. Indeed, Walzer writes after having considered all these permutations, "Liberal nations are…ideologically pluralist; their members are monarchists and republicans, libertarians and socialists, conservatives and radicals." By the author's account, America is exceptional only in its self-regard and sanctimony. He notes, wryly, "right-wing French politicians do not accuse French communists of engaging in un-French activities." America is also exceptional in being a democracy that harbors many enemies of democracy, ranging from religious orthodoxies to political parties that stand opposed to the "decency and truth" that liberalism encompasses and that occasion "the most important political battles of our time." A spirited, broad-ranging case for liberalism and against its populist and nationalist discontents. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Similar Items