Social justice fallacies

The noted conservative economist delivers arguments both fiscal and political against social justice initiatives such as welfare and a federal minimum wage. A Black scholar who has lived through many civil rights struggles, Sowell is also a follower of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, who insisted that free market solutions are available for every social problem. This short book begins with what amounts to an impatient declaration that life isn't fair. Some nations are wealthy because of geographical advantages, and some people are wealthy because they're smarter than others. "Some social justice advocates may implicitly assume that various groups have similar developed capabilities, so that different outcomes appear puzzling," he writes. In doing so, he argues, they fail to distinguish between equal opportunity and equal capability. Sowell is dismissive of claims that Black Americans and other minorities are systematically denied a level playing field: Put non-white kids in charter schools, he urges, and presto, their math scores will zoom northward as compared to those in public schools. "These are huge disparities within the same groups, so that neither race nor racism can account for these huge differences," he writes, clearly at pains to distance himself from the faintest suggestion that race has anything to do with success or failure in America. At the same time, he isn't exactly comfortable with the idea that economic inequalities exist, and he tries to finesse definitions to suit his convictions: "The terms 'rich' and 'poor' are misleading in another and more fundamental sense. These terms apply to people's stock of wealth, not their flows of income." As for crime? Give criminals more rights, he asserts, as with Miranda v. Arizona, and crime rates go up--an assertion that overlooks numerous other variables but fits Sowell's ideological slant. For those satisfied with blame-the-victim tidbits of received wisdom. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.