Happiness falls A novel

Angie Kim, 1969-

Large print - 2023

"We didn't call the police right away." Those are the electric first words of this extraordinary novel about a biracial Korean American family in Virginia whose lives are upended when their beloved father and husband goes missing. Mia, the irreverent, hyperanalytical twenty-year-old daughter, has an explanation for everything--which is why she isn't initially concerned when her father and younger brother Eugene don't return from a walk in a nearby park. They must have lost their phone. Or stopped for an errand somewhere. But by the time Mia's brother runs through the front door bloody and alone, it becomes clear that the father in this tight-knit family is missing and the only witness is Eugene, who has the rar...e genetic condition Angelman syndrome and cannot speak.What follows is both a ticking-clock investigation into the whereabouts of a father and an emotionally rich portrait of a family whose most personal secrets just may be at the heart of his disappearance. Full of shocking twists and fascinating questions of love, language, and human connection, Happiness Falls is a mystery, a family drama, and a novel of profound philosophical inquiry. With all the powerful storytelling she brought to her award-winning debut, Miracle Creek, Angie Kim turns the missing-person story into something wholly original, creating an indelible tale of a family who must go to remarkable lengths to truly understand one another.

Saved in:

1st Floor Show me where

LARGE PRINT/FICTION/Kim, Angie
0 / 1 copies available
Location Call Number   Status
1st Floor LARGE PRINT/FICTION/Kim, Angie Due Nov 21, 2024
Subjects
Genres
Large type books
Detective and mystery fiction
Fiction
Large print books
Novels
Published
New York : Random House Large Print [2023]
Language
English
Main Author
Angie Kim, 1969- (author)
Edition
First large print edition
Item Description
"A GMA Book Club Pick"--Cover.
"The Good Morning America Book Club"--Cover.
Physical Description
530 pages (large print) ; 24 cm
ISBN
9780593793756
Contents unavailable.
Review by Booklist Review

In Kim's latest (after Miracle Creek, 2019), Adam Parson goes missing, leaving behind his wife and children, including 15-year-old Eugene, who has autism and a rare genetic disorder called mosaic Angelman syndrome and is nonverbal. Narrated by hyperanalytical 20-year-old Mia, Eugene's sister, Happiness Falls follows this biracial Korean American family--mother, Eugene, and Mia's twin, John--as they try to figure out what happened to Adam. They follow sparse leads: the name of a woman with whom Adam was perhaps having an affair, and Adam's recovered, waterlogged notebook that detailed his work attempting to quantify a feeling called the Happiness Quotient. A dogged police officer raises suspicions, and soon Eugene is embroiled in the juvenile criminal justice system. Though there is no smooth resolution, it all circles back to Eugene in surprising ways. Kim explores themes of language and communication, with Mia reflecting on her time growing up in Korea and her family's methods for communicating with Eugene. Mia is a prickly, appealing narrator, going off on frequent tangents that add texture to the narrative. The result is a philosophical family drama that is as page-turning as it is thought-provoking. Book groups will find much to discuss here, especially those who like Celeste Ng.

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

Kim's bittersweet second novel (following Miracle Creek) intertwines an intimate family drama, a missing-persons mystery, and a philosophical rumination on happiness. Korean American college student Mia Parkson and her twin brother, John, are spending the Covid-19 lockdown at their parents' house in suburban Virginia. One morning, their autistic 14-year-old brother, Eugene, races home from a hike with their father, his clothing spattered with blood. Their father is nowhere to be found, and Eugene--who is nonverbal--isn't able to say what happened. While Mia and her family help authorities sift a bewildering array of clues, Mia studies analytical notes her father left behind, which posit that the experience of happiness is relative to an expected outcome--leading her to wonder whether her father is subjecting them all to an elaborate social experiment. Meanwhile, the Parksons investigate therapies Eugene has been undergoing that suggest they have underestimated his intelligence and ability to communicate--a revelation that dovetails with Mia's own complex thoughts on how factors including race, language, and emotion all impact people's interpretation of information and ability to relate to one another. Readers will be fascinated with how Kim bends the structure of a whodunit to serve a broader exploration of the dynamics of human relations and moved by her skill at wresting joy from tragedy. Agent: Susan Golomb, Writers House. (Sept.)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Kirkus Book Review

When her father disappears, 20-year-old Mia Parkson cannot ask the one person who knows what happened--her brother, who does not speak. After Miracle Creek (2019), the title of Kim's second novel could make it seem to be part of a series--and thematically, it is, again combining an exploration of neurodiversity and its effects on family dynamics with a mystery, in this case a missing person story, again set in the Northern Virginia suburbs, again with a smart woman lawyer named Shannon Haug on the scene to make brilliant charts. Here, Kim has done even more with what are now clearly her signature materials by nesting this whole situation inside the philosophical question of what creates happiness, one which the missing man, Adam Parson, was privately studying in notebooks documenting his research and experimentation (most of it on his own family). All of this comes to us through the narrator, his daughter, Mia, a brilliant, acerbic chatterbox whose relentless analysis spills from long, ropy sentences into parentheticals and footnotes that lasso the reader into turning the pages. Listen to her: "Labeling anything about our family 'typical'--I just have to shake my head. I'm not even thinking about the typical-adjacent stuff like John's and my boy-girl twin thing, our biracial mix (Korean and white), untraditional parental gender roles (working mom, stay-at-home dad), or different last names (Parson for Dad + Park for Mom = mashed up into Parkson for us kids)....Where we're in-dubitably, inherently atypical is with my little brother Eugene's dual diagnosis: autism and a rare genetic disorder called mosaic Angel-man syndrome (AS), which means he can't talk, has motor difficul-ties, and--this is what fascinates many people who've never heard of AS--has an unusually happy demeanor with frequent smiles and laughter." Got all that? Mia is an amazing creation, as is Eugene. But what is most remarkable about this book is the way Mia's father's "happiness quotient" theory ripples not just through the plot of the novel, but through the life of the reader. The claim that a book will change your life often seems like exaggeration. Here the potential is real. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

One Locke, Bach, and K-­pop We didn't call the police right away. Later, I would blame myself, wonder if things might have turned out differently if I hadn't shrugged it off, insisting Dad wasn't missing missing but just delayed, probably still in the woods looking for Eugene, thinking he'd run off somewhere. Mom says it wasn't my fault, that I was merely being optimistic, but I know better. I don't believe in optimism. I believe there's a fine line (if any) between optimism and willful idiocy, so I try to avoid optimism altogether, lest I fall over the line mistakenly. My twin brother, John, keeps trying to make me feel better, too, saying we couldn't have known something was wrong because it was such a typical morning, which is an asinine thing to say because why would you assume things can't go wrong simply because they haven't yet? Life isn't geometry; terrible, life-­changing moments don't happen predictably, at the bottom of a linear slope. Tragedies and accidents are tragic and accidental precisely because of their unexpectedness. Besides, labeling anything about our family "typical"--­I just have to shake my head. I'm not even thinking about the typical-­adjacent stuff like John's and my boy-­girl twin thing, our biracial mix (Korean and white), untraditional parental gender roles (working mom, stay-­at-­home dad), or different last names (Parson for Dad + Park for Mom = the mashed-­up Parkson for us kids)--­not common, certainly, but hardly shocking in our area these days. Where we're indubitably, inherently atypical is with my little brother Eugene's dual diagnosis: autism and a rare genetic disorder called mosaic Angelman syndrome (AS), which means he can't talk, has motor difficulties, and--­this is what fascinates many people who've never heard of AS--­has an unusually happy demeanor with frequent smiles and laughter. Sorry, I'm getting sidetracked. It's one of my biggest faults and something I'm trying to work on. (To be honest, I don't like shutting it down entirely because sometimes, those tangents can end up being important and/or fun. For example, my honors thesis, Philosophy of Music and Algorithmic Programming: Locke, Bach, and K-­pop vs. Prokofiev, Sartre, and Jazz Rap, grew from a footnote in my original proposal. Also, I can't help it; it's the way my mind works. So here's a compromise: I'll put my side points in footnotes. If you love fun little detours like Dad and me, you can read them. If you find footnotes annoying (like John) or want to know what happened ASAP (like Mom), you can skip them. If you're undecided, you can try a few, mix and match.) So, anyway, I was talking about the police. The fact is, I knew something was wrong. We all did. We didn't want to call the police because we didn't want to say it out loud, much the same way I'm going around and around now, fixating on this peripheral issue of calling the police instead of just saying what happened. Here goes: my fifty-­year-­old father, Adam Parson, is missing. At 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 2020, he and my fourteen-­year-­old brother Eugene hiked to the nearby River Falls Park, the same as they had done most mornings since I'd been home from college for the quarantine. We know they made it to the park; witnesses have come forward, a dozen hikers and dog-­walkers who saw them together at various points around the waterfall trail as late as 11:10 a.m. At 11:38 a.m. (we know the exact time from the dashcam recording), Eugene was out of the woods, running in the middle of a narrow country road in our neighborhood, forcing a driver who'd run through a stop sign and turned too fast to swerve into a ditch to avoid hitting him. Just before the dashcam video jolts from the crash, you can see a fuzzy Eugene, not stopping, not turning, not even looking at the car or at anything else--­just stumbling a little, so close to the car you'd swear he got hit. The screech of the tires and the sound of the car thudding into the ditch, not to mention the chain reaction of the two cars behind it, apparently caused a terrible cacophony of metallic crunching, banging, and squealing that brought people out, and bystanders reported seeing a boy they later identified as Eugene staggering away. It bears note that not one of the five bystanders, three drivers, or two passengers involved in the crash saw my father precede, follow, or accompany Eugene. We confirmed this multiple times, and it is beyond dispute: Eugene was in our neighborhood alone. While all that was going on, I was in the midst of what I was thinking of as one of the great tragic moments of my life. It's funny how relative these types of judgments are, how much they can change depending on context: that day has obviously since become The Day Dad Disappeared, but if you'd asked me that morning, I'd have sworn it was The Day of the Big Breakup. Not that it was as dramatic as all that. The breakup itself had, unbeknownst to me, happened earlier through Vic's semi-­ghosting, which I'd noticed but misinterpreted as him needing alone time. This was my first Serious Relationship (as in, one lasting more than six months), and I thought I was being considerate in stepping back rather than nagging for attention and insisting he open up to me and bare his soul or whatever, but what I was apparently actually doing was failing a test of some sort--­how much I cared, how much our relationship meant to me, etc. That morning's call was merely a courtesy notification of the results. I listened quietly to Vic's (trying a little too hard to be) cool, matter-­of-­fact conclusion that he thought it best we "remain separated" because I obviously didn't care all that much, and it occurred to me that this call was yet another test, which I could pass by acting upset and saying "of course I care" and "it's just the quarantine and the ­agony of being apart, the angst of isolation," blah blah. But I don't do ­drama. Also, I was pretty pissed that this guy who usually extolled my "refreshingly low-­maintenance lack of game playing" was playing one himself and expecting me to participate and excel. It was juvenile, insulting, and, frankly, more than a little deceitful. Which is exactly what I said as soon as he stopped talking, right before I hung up. (I believe in saying what you're thinking, as much as is practicable.) I threw my phone across the room--­hanging up on an iPhone isn't nearly as satisfying as slamming down an old-­fashioned phone like our kitchen landline, and besides, I had an industrial-­strength titanium phone protector--­but damned if it didn't land on my plush comforter. I was contemplating picking it up to try again when I saw something out the window that stopped me: a boy in a bright yellow shirt, rounding our street corner, running fast. The thing my brain couldn't reconcile was that the shirt was definitely Eugene's--­I distinctly remembered him wearing it that morning--­but that running gait was definitely not. Eugene's mosaic Angelman syndrome means that he has two distinct sets of genes in his body: some cells with an imprinting defect and some that function normally. The mosaicism makes him "less affected," without some of the most severe symptoms that can plague AS kids, like seizures and difficulties walking and eating. Eugene can do some things he's been practicing all his life like using utensils, walking, and even running, but he has issues maintaining consistent coordination and speed. It's like a tongue twister; you might manage saying it once or twice carefully and slowly, but the longer and/or quicker the utterance, the greater the chances of tripping up. Eugene needed years of therapy just to walk long distances--­that's why the daily hikes to and from the park with Dad, for practice--­and I'd always thought he didn't like running at all. So how was it possible that this boy who appeared to be my little brother was running the length of our long street? It's funny with siblings, how you think of them as just there, but then something great or awful happens that unearths and makes visible what Koreans call jeong. It's hard to explain in English; it's not any particular emotion--­not affection or even love--­but a complex bond defined by its depth and history: that sense of belonging to the same whole, your fates intertwined, impossible to sever no matter how much you may want to. I rushed downstairs, threw open the front door, and ran outside, barefoot. "Oh my God, Eugene, look at you go," I yelled out and clapped and--God, this is so not me, but I couldn't help it--­even whooped and jumped a little. Excerpted from Happiness Falls (Good Morning America Book Club): A Novel by Angie Kim All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.