The most powerful court in the world A history of the Supreme Court of the United States

Banner (law, Univ. of California) has written an excellent historical study of the US Supreme Court and its role in American politics. Banner should be commended because this is truly one of the best books available on the highest court in the land. The study is extremely comprehensive, covering all the important justices, case law, appointments or confirmation processes, and how each has evolved throughout American history. The discussion of jurisprudence is especially noteworthy because Banner describes each development of an area of constitutional law by concisely stating only the most important legal principle from a case and showing the connections to past precedents. The text also provides valuable political and institutional context to give the reader a complete understanding of the events under discussion. The book is remarkably well balanced from an ideological standpoint and is not overburdened by either unnecessary legal jargon or editorial commentary. It is rare to find a book with no real drawbacks and would make a great addition to any library. Summing Up: Essential. All readership levels. --Billy W. Monroe, Prairie View A&M University

The fiery language directed at SCOTUS obscures a fascinating, complex story, says this engaging book. The past decade has seen waves of vitriol directed at the Supreme Court from one side or another, so it is refreshing to find a book that sets out the institution's history without histrionics. Banner is a distinguished legal academic who has written a series of interesting books, includingHow the Indians Lost Their Land,The Death Penalty, andThe Decline of Natural Law, and his intention here is to explain how the Court has operated since its founding. A point that is often missed is that the Court focuses on appeals, judicial review, and technical issues of law. It can, if it chooses, hear cases where the facts are in dispute, but those are unusual. It is often seen as leaning toward the conservative side of the spectrum, but in the 1960s and 1970s it was certainly of a liberal bent. Critics often claimed, then, that in decisions likeMiranda,Brown, andRoe, it was ignoring public opinion, going beyond its constitutional role, and creating disruption. When the Court became more conservative, its previous supporters and opponents switched sides and arguments, apparently without a hint of irony. Banner lays out the reasoning in recent cases likeDobbs but is scrupulously evenhanded, offering no opinion about the legal merits of either the decision or the dissent. He notes that calls for changing the Court to affect decisions, such as by increasing the number of judges, are not new but have never received much support. For its part, the Court often shows a surprising independent streak. Banner avoids jargon wherever possible, and the result is a book that is accessible, intelligent, and colorful. With clear-minded authority, Banner tells the story of a crucial, but misunderstood, part of the constitutional structure. Copyright (c) Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.