You are not a kinesthetic learner The troubled history of the learning style idea

Thomas D. Fallace

Book - 2025

"The notion that we all process information in one of three distinct modes--visual, auditory, or kinesthetic--is familiar to all of us; indeed, it has shaped teaching practices for decades. It may be surprising, then, to learn that the notion of learning styles is in fact widely debunked. So why does it retain such a powerful hold on us? In this book, historian Thomas Fallace traces the origins, evolution, and history of the controversial learning style idea. He shows that the research supporting the learning style idea was problematic from its inception in the 1910s as a strategy for teaching students in remedial reading classes. Decades later, as the Civil Rights movement demanded government solutions to racial inequality, scholars o...f education began to look for tools to address discrepancies in schooling outcomes between white children and children of color. Cultural differences perceived as deficits in Black and Brown children were taken to justify teaching with a different learning style requiring a distinct approach. In the 1980s, many scholars and educators determined that students of color were 'kinesthetic' learners, an idea used to label and justify a diminished curriculum for Black and Latinx students. In our era of high-stakes testing, administrators and teachers have eagerly embraced learning styles as a common-sense approach that seemed to promise positive outcomes. However, research increasingly shows that empirical studies do not find the approach effective. Rather than labeling students as visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learners (along with the hidden value judgments in each category), teachers ought to be labeling activities and then using the most appropriate method for the content or topic at hand. Ultimately, Fallace issues a full-throated call for the end of learning styles as the basis for an instructional tool kit. The danger of the learning style idea lies in the act of sorting and labeling students with permanent style identities"--

Saved in:
1 copy ordered
Subjects
Published
Chicago : The University of Chicago Press 2025.
Language
English
Main Author
Thomas D. Fallace (author)
Physical Description
211 pages ; 23 cm
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN
9780226841366
9780226841380
  • Introduction: The learning style idea
  • Sensory channels and personality types
  • Diagnosing learning styles
  • The rise and fall of the Black learning style idea
  • Multiple intelligences as learning styles
  • The kinesthetic learner as identity
  • The peak years
  • Debunking the myth of learning styles
  • Conclusion.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

A harmful pedagogical theory has reigned supreme for decades despite a lack of evidence in its favor, according to this unsettling history. Education scholar Fallace (In the Shadow of Authoritarianism) argues that the "learning style" hypothesis (e.g., "that everyone has a style of learning through which they learn best") is grounded in racism. Tracing the history of the idea from its nebulous early-20th-century origins in the field of cognitive psychology, through its midcentury crossover into education and business schools, to its late-20th- and early-21st-century ascendance as common sense pedagogical practice, Fallace shows that the idea has never been proven or even seriously tested for educational environments. He further demonstrates that what was, at best, a humanist theory expressing a need to embrace individual difference, was from the outset warped into a means for reinforcing racial hierarchies (a core tenet became that Black and Latino students excelled with a more "physical approach to learning"). Fallace writes that, in chasing down the notion's origins, he found the opposite of what he expected--not researchers pushing a hackneyed idea, but researchers cautioning against their theory being adopted for practical application even as educators latched onto it. He posits that educators were looking for an excuse to alleviate growing expectations placed on them regarding Black and Latino educational outcomes. Rigorous and persuasive, this is a must-read for educators. (May)

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved